Saturday, July 31, 2021

John 14:28 – The Father Is Greater Than I

By Ronald R. Day, Sr. (ResLight; RLBible)

(This study needs to edited) 



The claim is being made that Jesus' words in John 14:28 means:


The Father is “greater” than the incarnate Christ in terms of position because Christ’s humanity is a creation, though in His divinity He is equal to the Father…. This verse is a clear reference to the Hypostatic Union of Christ.


As is often the case with trinitarians, it is simply assumed that acceptance of the trinity dogma should considered the default reasoning,  and that it is up to others to disprove that which being promoted as the default position. Of course, there is nothing directly in the scriptures where the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob bluntly states: I am not more than one person. Why should there be? In reality, the default assumption is that Yahweh is only person, not that he is more than one person. Indeed, throughout the Bible, in what God has revealed of Himself by means of His Holy Spirit, we find that Yahweh, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, is always presented as one person, and never once presented as more than one person. Additionally, we find that he God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob is identified as one person who is the God and Father of Jesus. (Acts 3:13-26; Ephesians 1:3; Hebrews 1:1,2; 1 Peter 1:3) Thus, the default reasoning should be that the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob is one person, not that He is three persons. Nor do we find any reason within the Bible for adding to what God has revealed through the prophets and the apostles that the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob is three persons.  (Deuteronomy 18:15-19; Matthew 4:4 (Deuteronomy 8:3; Luke 4:4); Matthew 4:7 (Deuteronomy 6:16); Matthew 4:10 (Exodus 20:3-5; 34:14; Deuteronomy 6:13,14; 10:20; Luke 4:8); Matthew 22:29-40; Matthew 26:42; Matthew 27:46; Mark 10:6 (Genesis 1:27; Genesis 2:7,20-23); Mark 14:36; 15:34; Luke 22:42; John 4:3; 5:30; 6:38; 17:1,3; 20:17; Acts 3:13-26; Romans 15:6; 2 Corinthians 1:3; 11:31; Ephesians 1:3,17; Hebrews 1:1,2,9; 10:7; 1 Peter 1:3; Revelation 2:7; 3:2,12.


The truth is, since the Bible no where identifies Jesus as the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, and since the Bible no where says one word about there being more than one person in the only true God, we have no reason to imagine and assume that what is being suggested above, that the idea of a hypostatic union in which Jesus has two alleged natures at once, that is, that he is both fully man, a little lower than the angels, and at the same time that he is fully God, the Supreme Being over all. Thus, the imaginations and assumptions that are being placed upon Jesus’ words so as to make them appear to support the added-on trinitarian dogma is not the basis we should accept for such belief.


One of the odd things about this is that the following words of Jesus as recorded in John 14:29 are often referred as proof that Jesus is the only true God. Those who do such, in effect, would separate Jesus’ statement in John 14:28 from his following statement in John 14:29 so as to make it appear that his first statement is not his alleged God being speaking, while the second statement is the God Jesus speaking. And such an application of Jesus’ words would have to applied, not only throughout the Gospels, but also in the Revelation, as well as many of the Old Testament prophets and all of the books of the Bible. If one analyzes the implications of such applications, it would become obvious that, in many cases, it would result in self-contradictions.


In John 14:1 Jesus is recorded as stating: ““Don’t let your heart be troubled. Believe in God. Believe also in me.” In this verse, is “God” three persons, or one person? Is Jesus saying to his disciples, you believe in the three persons of the “trinity”; believe also in me”? Obviously, Jesus is using the word “God” here as referring to only one person.


In John 14:9, however, rather than claiming that Jesus is speaking as a man, many trinitarians claim that Jesus spoke as God. We are pointing this out only to show how the trinitarians will go back and forth in applying and forcing their “hypostatic union” assumption upon the scripture, applying words that they would like use to prove that he is the Most High as allegedly being the God Jesus speaking, while words that would show that he is not the Most High as meaning that it was the man Jesus.  In reality, it was the man Jesus who spoke all of these words attributed to Jesus in John 14, since Jesus was indeed in the days of his flesh (Hebrews 5:7) while he spoke these words.


Click Here regarding Hebrews 2:9. Hebrews 2:9 applies to Jesus throughout all the time describe in Hebrews 5:7 as the days of his flesh. Thus everything that Jesus said during the days of his flesh was the man Jesus Christ speaking, that man who gave himself as ransom for all, who was put to death in the flesh, but made alive in the spirit. — 1 Timothy 2:5,6; 1 Peter 3:18.

Revelation 1:8 – The Lord God, Who Was, Is, And Is To Come (Video Script)

(The text below was copied from the old site that no longer exists, without editing. This still needs to be edited. Links may not work.) 


Revelation 1:7

Behold, he is coming with the clouds, and every eye will see him, including those who pierced him. All the tribes of the earth will mourn over him. Even so, Amen.


Revelation 1:8

“I am the Alpha and the Omega, the Beginning and the End,” says the Lord God, “who is and who was and who is to come, the Almighty.” — World English Bible Version.


Should we assume that the “the Lord God” “who is and who was and who is to come, the Almighty” in Revelation 1:8 is Jesus?


The most simple and straightforward scriptural conclusion is that in Revelation 1:8, “the Lord God” “who is and was and who is to come” is not Jesus, but rather the unipersonal “God” of Revelation 1:1,4.


However, many trinitarians and some others do not accept the simple and straightforward conclusion, but would imagine and assume  that in Revelation 1:8 Jesus himself claimed to be the Almighty.


The phrase “is to come” is often taken out of context of what is said in verse 8 and associated with the word “coming” in Revelation 7, thus giving the inference that both are speaking of the same “coming”.


It is often further claimed that since in verse 7 it is Jesus who is being referred to as “coming”, that it is Jesus who is being quoted in verse 8 who states that he “is to come”..


Yes, the words in Revelation 1:7 are indeed the words of Jesus.


Nevertheless, in Revelation 1:8, John begins to quote the God and Father of Jesus (Ephesians 1:3; 1 Peter 1:3; Revelation 3:5,12): “I am the Alpha and the Omega, the Beginning and the End,” says the Lord God, “who is and who was and who is to come, the Almighty.” — World English.


All through the Revelation given to John, Jesus is distinguished from “God”.


All through the Revelation, Jesus is distinguished from ‘he who is, was and is to come’.


Revelation 1:1

This is the Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show to his servants the things which must happen soon, which he sent and made known by his angel to his servant, John. — World English Bible version.


We find that, in Revelation 1:1, “God” is clearly distinguished from “Jesus Christ”, as it should be.


It is “God” who gives the revelation to “Jesus Christ”. “Jesus Christ”, in turn gives the revelation to his servants by means of John. — Revelation 1:1.


Revelation 1:1 speaks of Jesus with the title “Christ”, that is: “Jesus Christ”. “Christ” means “Anointed”.


Who anointed Jesus?


Isaiah 61: 1 – The Spirit of the Lord Yahweh is on me; because Yahweh has anointed me to preach good news to the humble; he has sent me to bind up the broken-hearted, to proclaim liberty to the captives, and the opening [of the prison] to those who are bound. — World English.


The Messiah is prophetically quoted as saying: “Yahweh has anointed me.” — Isaiah 61:1, World English.


Thus, the Anointed One — the Christ — recognizes “Yahweh” (Jehovah) as the one who anointed him.


In the words recorded as Luke 4:14-23, Jesus identified himself as the one whom Yahweh anointed as spoken of in Isaiah 61:1.


This means that “God” in Psalm 45:7; Acts 2:36; 10:38; and Hebrews 1:9 is “Yahweh”.


It also means that the unipersonal “God” of Revelation 1:1,2,4,6,8,9 is not Jesus, but the “Lord Yahweh” of Isaiah 61:1 who anointed Jesus, thus making him “Jesus Christ” of Revelation 1:1.


Also in Isaiah 61:1, note that the Messiah refers to his God as “the Lord Yahweh” and in verse two as "our God."


Since we have identified “God’ who anointed Jesus as as Christ (Revelation 1:1) as being “the Lord Yahweh”, this further means that in Revelation 1:8, it is this same one — “the Lord Yahweh” of Isaiah 61:1, who is referred to in the World English and many other translations as the “the Lord God”.


Thus, “the Lord God” of Revelation 1:8 in the World English Bible version is the Lord Yahweh of Isaiah 61:1, and is not Jesus, but rather the one who anointed Jesus, making him “Jesus Christ” as shown in Revelation 1:1.


Revelation 1:4

John, to the seven assemblies that are in Asia: Grace to you and peace, from God, who is and who was and who is to come; and from the seven Spirits who are before his throne;

Revelation 1:5

and from Jesus Christ, the faithful witness, the firstborn of the dead, and the ruler of the kings of the earth. To him who loves us, and washed us from our sins by his blood;

Revelation 1:6

and he made us to be a kingdom, priests to his God and Father; to him be the glory and the dominion forever and ever. Amen. — World English Bible version.


Revelation 1:4,5 clearly distinguishes Jesus from he ‘who is, was and is to come’. It is the unipersonal “God” of Revelation 1:1 who is identified in Revelation 1:4 as being “who is and who was and who is to come.”


Thus, in Revelation 1:8, “who is and who was and who is to come, the Almighty.” is not Jesus, but rather the God of Jesus, “God” who has given the revelation to Jesus. — Revelation 1:1.


Nor does “is to come” in Revelation 1:8 refer to the same thing as the “coming” in Revelation 1:7.


As far as we know, no one claims that when the Almighty says “who was”, that this means that He was coming from somewhere or that he was going to somewhere in the past.


Likewise, we know of no one who claims that when He says “who is”, that this means He is presently going somewhere or coming from somewhere.


In other words, the Almighty was not saying that he was coming from or to somewhere in the past, or that he is coming from or to somewhere in the present, and thus, He was likewise not saying that he will be coming from or coming to somewhere in the future.


Consequently, most Greek Bible scholars conclude that Revelation 1:8 speaks of God’s being, his eternal existence, past, present and future, even if they believe that this verse is in reference to Jesus.


Nevertheless, the context (Revelation 1:1,4) tells us that, in Revelation 1:8, it is the Almighty Yahweh, the God and Father of Jesus who is speaking as the one who was, is and is to come.


Accordingly, the conclusion is that Jesus is not the one who was, is, and is to come in Revelation 1:8.


The peculiar phrase in Revelation 1:8 only belongs to Yahweh, not to Jesus.


Yahweh has existed from all eternity past, he exists now, and he exists for all time to come. This is basically what Yahweh is saying in Revelation 1:8.


“Is to come” simply extends the thought of God’s existence into the infinite future, just as “who was” is speaking of God’s past, and “is” is speaking his being in the present. Thus, it is all inclusive of past, present and future.


The summation is that the most direct scriptural conclusion is that “the Lord God, ‘who is and who was and who is to come, the Almighty’” in Revelation 1:8 is “God” of Revelation 1:1,4, not Jesus, as has been demonstrated.


For further study, see:


Alpha and Omega, the First and the Last

http://godandson.reslight.net/?p=325


Revelation 1:4 – Who Is, Was, To Come – Jesus?

http://godandson.reslight.net/?p=1097


Revelation 1:8 – The God of Jesus Speaks

http://sonofyah.wordpress.com/2008/09/18/ao-01/


Revelation 1:1,8 and the Unipersonal God

http://godandson.reslight.net/?p=1393


Revelation 1:8 – Is Yahweh or Jesus Being Quoted?

http://godandson.reslight.net/?p=66


Revelation 1:17,18; 2:8 – The First and the Last

http://godandson.reslight.net/?p=911


Revelation 21:6 – God Who Sits on the Throne

http://sonofyah.wordpress.com/2008/09/18/ao-2/


Revelation 22:13 – I am Alpha and Omega

http://sonofyah.wordpress.com/2008/09/18/ao-03/


The video of the above is online at:

http://youtu.be/R8qRpSXDXbk


By Ronald R. Day, Sr. (ResLight, RLBible)

Friday, July 30, 2021

Spirit and Greek Gender

Many note that certain translations refer to the Holy Spirit as “he”, “him”, “his”, etc., and present such scriptures as an argument that the Holy Spirit is a male person. Some even have made the erroneous claim that the Textus Receptus never refers to the Holy Spirit as an “it”, or that the Greek New Testament always refers to the Holy Spirit with masculine pronouns. Actually, the Textus Receptus does indeed refer to the Holy Spirit with neuter pronouns, not masculine pronouns, as is also true of all the known New Testament Greek manuscripts that are usually used for translation.

The only exception I know of is when the holy spirit is being associated with being the Comforter, as in John 15:25. Since the Greek word for “Comforter” is masculine, masculine pronouns are used to agree with this. This is often called “gender agreement”, but such agreement in Koine Greek does not necessarily mean that what is being spoken of is actually being designated as a “he” or “she” or “it”. The same is true of Biblical Hebrew, and is also true of many other languages.

The Koine Greek word for “spirit” is neuter in form, and thus it usually takes neuter forms of pronouns. Many translations, however, based the preconception that God's Holy Spirit is a person, add masculine personal pronouns to many scriptures referring to the Holy Spirit.

The Biblical Hebrew word for spirit is feminine, and thus usually takes feminine forms of pronouns. Biblical Hebrew does not have a neuter gender. God's Holy Spirit, however, is definitely not a female, although I have come across some who have made such a claim.

The point is, however, that if translators view the Holy Spirit as being a person, they may supply the words “he”, “his”, “him”, etc., even though the Greek form is neuter, and thus, strictly speaking should be “it”. The usage of translations that supply masculine pronouns for the Holy Spirit as proof that God’s Holy Spirit is a person, however, would actually be “circular reasoning”, for it would be saying, in effect, that since we believe that the Holy Spirit is a person, we have supplied masculine pronouns related the Holy Spirit, and thus, because we have supplied these masculine pronouns, these masculine pronouns prove that the Holy Spirit is a person. Such is actually a form of fallacious reasoning.

The King James Version uses the neuter pronoun “it” of “the Spirit” four times. — John 1:32; Romans 8:16, 26; 1 Peter 1:11.

In reality, since both Hebrew and Greek most often uses gender in a different manner than such is used in English, the usage of either masculine and/or neuter pronouns in Koine Greek as well as Biblical Greek cannot be used to determine whether the Holy Spirit is a male person or an “it”. Likewise, in Biblical Hebrew the usage of feminine pronouns certainly does not designate the Holy Spirit as being a female person.

By Ronald R. Day, Sr. (ResLight, RLBible)

Written By Others
(I do not necessarily agree with all conclusions given)

Gender of the Holy Spirit (Wikipedia)

Pronouns, Subjects, Objects and Owners



Thursday, July 29, 2021

The Living and True God

 But Jehovah is the true God, He is the living God and the everlasting King. At His wrath the earth shall tremble, and the nations shall not be able to stand His indignation. – (Jeremiah 10:10, Green’s Literal)

By Ronald R. Day, Sr.

(1) Many today have lost all faith that there is a “living and true God.” They hear and listen to the confusing and conflicting ideas presented concerning him from traditional theology and decide that such a god, if he exists, is not worthy of worship. But he who can look into the sky with a telescope, or even with the natural eye alone, and see the immensity of creation, its symmetry, beauty, order, harmony and diversity, and yet doubt that the Creator of these is vastly his superior both in wisdom and power, or who can suppose for a moment that such order came by chance, without a Creator, has so far lost or ignored the faculty of reason as to be properly what the Bible calls him, a fool. (Psalm 14:1) It is a self-evident truth that effects must be produced by competent causes. Every plant and every flower, even, speaks volumes of testimony on this subject. Intricate in construction, exquisitely beautiful in form and texture, each speaks of wisdom and skill above the human. How shortsighted the absurdity which boasts of the human skill and ingenuity, and attributes to mere chance the regularity, uniformity and harmony of creation. It has been popular with such to refer to God’s creation as “nature.” But even so, these acknowledge the laws of “nature”, while denying that “nature” has an intelligent Lawgiver.

(2) Some who deny the existence of an intelligent Creator claim that “nature” is the only God, and that from nature all forms of animal and vegetable developments proceeded without the ordering of intelligence, but are governed, they say, by some kind of process of evolution.

(3) Various atheistic models have been presented, but, while impressive, the basic hypothesis of human evolution* as it often conceived has not actually been proven. But many scientists believe that it has been proven, and they speak dogmatically as though it is a proven fact. Concerning this, a biologist by the name of John R. Durant wrote in the LONDON GUARDIAN: “Many scientists succumb to the temptation to be dogmatic, … over and over again the question of the origin of the species has been presented as if it were finally settled. Nothing could be further from the truth…. But the tendency to be dogmatic persists, and it does no service to the cause of science.” (THE GUARDIAN, London, “Beginning to Have Doubts,” by John Durant, December 4, 1980) Although mutations, crossbreeds, and certain changes have been noted within each “kind” of animal, even after decades of repeated endeavors, they have never succeeded in producing a new fixed kind. No instance is known where one kind has changed into another kind. Though there are fish that can use their fins for a moment as wings, and fly out of the water, and frogs that can sing, they have never been known to change into birds; and though there are among brutes some that bear a slight resemblance to men, the evidence is wholly lacking that man was evolved from such creatures. On the contrary, investigations prove that though different varieties of the same kind may be produced, it is impossible to permanently blend the various “kinds,” or for one to evolve from another. For the same reason the donkey and the horse, though resembling each other, cannot be claimed to be related, for it is well known that their offspring is imperfect and cannot propagate either species.
————–
*Note: We do believe that the Bible allows that a process of evolution may have been used in vegetation and lower animal life, as they are said to have been brought forth. (Genesis 1:11,24) However, according to the Bible, man was a special creation, having been created perfect and without sin, from which state he fell. See also our study: The Ransom For All.

(4) Surely if unintelligent “nature” were the creator or evolver she would continue the process, and there would be no such thing as fixed “kinds,” since without intelligence nothing would arrive at fixed conditions. Evolution would be a fact today, and we would see about us fish becoming birds, and monkeys becoming men, etc. This theory we conclude to be as contrary to human reason as to the Bible, when it claims that intelligent created beings were created by a power lacking intelligence.

The heavens declare the glory of God. — Psalm 119:1

(5) The study of creation reveals wonders upon wonders. We will not here go into all the details of creation, and how it confirms that there is an intelligent Creator, We claim, however, that the existence of an intelligent Creator is a clearly demonstrated truth, the proof of which lies all around us, yes, and within us; for we are his workmanship (Psalm 114:4), whose every power and of mind and body speaks of marvelous skill beyond our comprehension. And he is also the Designer and Creator of what many have termed “nature.” We claim that He ordered and established the laws of nature, the beauty and harmony of whose operation we see and admire. This One whose wisdom planned and whose power upholds and guides the universe, whose wisdom and power so immeasurably transcend our own, we instinctively worship and adore.

A Great and Awesome God — Deuteronomy 10:17

(6) To realize the existence of this mighty God is but to dread his omnipotent strength, unless we can see him possessed of benevolence and goodness corresponding to his power. Of this fact we are also fully assured by the same evidence which proves his existence, power and wisdom. Not only are we forced to the conclusion that there is a God, and that His power and wisdom are immeasurably beyond our own, but we are forced by reason to the conclusion that the grandest thing created is not superior to its Creator. Hence we must conclude that the greatest manifestation of benevolence and justice among men is inferior in scope to that of the Creator, even as man’s wisdom is inferior to His. And thus we have before our mental vision the personal traits and attributes of the great Creator. He is wise, just, loving and powerful. The scope of his attributes is, of necessity, immeasurably wider than that of his grandest creation.

(7) But further: having reached this reasonable conclusion relative to the existence and personality of our Creator, let us inquire — “What should we expect from such a being?” The answer would be that the possession of such attributes reasonably argues their exercise, their use. God’s power must be used, and that in harmony with his own nature wisely, justly, and lovingly. Whatever may be the means to that end, whatever may be the operation of God’s power, the final outcome must be consistent with his nature and personal attributes, and every step must be approved of his infinite wisdom.

(8) What would be more reasonable than such exercise of power as we see manifested in the creation of countless worlds about us, and in the wonderful variety of earth? What could be more reasonable than the creation of man, endowed with reason and judgment, capable of appreciating his Creator’s works, and judging of his skill,l of his wisdom, power, and love? All this is reasonable, and all in perfect accord with facts known to us.

(9) But there is more we could reason about the Creator. Should we not suppose that such an infinitely wise and good being, having made a creature capable of appreciating himself and his plan, would be moved by his love and justice to supply the wants of that creature’s nature, by giving him some REVELATION? Would it not be a reasonable supposition, that God would supply to man information concerning the object of his existence, and his plans for the future? On the contrary, we ask, would it not be unreasonable to suppose that such a Creator would make such a creature as man, endow him with powers of reason reaching out into the future, and yet make no revelation of his plans to meet those longings? Such a course would be unreasonable, because contrary to the character which we reasonably attribute to God contrary to the proper course of being controlled by justice and love.

(10) We may reason that in creating man, had divine wisdom decided it inexpedient to grant him a knowledge of his future destiny, and his share in his Creator’s plans, then surely divine justice, as well as divine love, would have insisted that the being would be so limited in his capacity that he would not continually be tormented and perplexed with doubts, and fears, and ignorance. Consequently, divine power would have been used under those limitations. The fact, then, that man has capacity for appreciating a revelation of the Creator’s plans, taken in connection with the personal attributes of his Creator as we have presented above, is an abundant reason for expecting that God would grant such a revelation, in such time and manner as his wisdom approved. So, then, in view of these considerations, even if we were ignorant of the Bible, reason would lead us to expect and to be on the lookout for some such revelation as the Bible claims to be. And furthermore, noting the order and harmony of the general creation, as in grand procession the spheres and systems keep time and place, we cannot but conclude that the minor irregularities, such as earthquakes, cyclones, etc., are but indications that the working together of the various elements of this world is not at present perfect. An assurance that all will ultimately be perfect and harmonious on earth as in the heavens, with some explanation as to why it is not so at present, are requests that are not unreasonable for reasoning men to ask, nor for the Creator, whose wisdom, power and love are demonstrated, to answer. Hence we should expect the revelation sought to include such an assurance and such an explanation.

(11) If the Bible presents the personal attributes of God in perfect harmony with what reason as described above dictates, we should conclude that it thus proves itself to be the needed and expected revelation from God, and should then accept its testimony as such. If of God, its teachings, when properly appreciated, will accord his personal attributes, which reason assures us is perfect in wisdom, justice, love and power.

An Unknown God

(12) The Bible tells us, however, that there are those that are called gods, which are, in fact, not gods. (1 Corinthians 8:5) This is in accord with the facts, for no matter where you go on earth, you find people worshiping “gods” in some form or another. There are “gods” worshiped in the form of Buddha, Brahma, Allah, and many other names. The people who adhere to these “gods” often use many writings believed to be divine revelations from their own “gods”. The books and revelations purported to be from the false gods fall far short of the wonderful divine plan that is revealed in the Bible. In professed “Christian” lands millions claim to know the true God, whom they refer as “the Lord”. But, if we believe the Bible, then very few of these “believers” in various gods have actually come to know the true God. (Matthew 7:13,14,21-23) Both in and out of popular Christianity, the true God is still to most people an “unknown God”, to some degree or other. (Acts 17:23)This is because too many, even though they profess to be Christian, fall short in understanding the Creator’s purposes and have proclaimed counterfeit gospel messages.

(13) Instead of worshiping in “spirit and truth” (John 4:24), many who profess Christianity have adopted false teachings and practices from the Greeks and Romans and proclaim them as “Christian”. Such was foretold in the Bible. (Matthew 13:24-30; Acts 20:29,30; 2 Thessalonians 2:1-12; 1 Timothy 4:1-3; 2 Timothy 4:3,4) True, thousands profess Jesus as their savior. But of these thousands, very few take the time to learn the real purposes of their Creator. Even most who do at heart belong to Christ remain as babes in Christ, failing to develop and grow in knowledge and grace. (2 Peter 3:18) Jesus appears to refer to these as servants who do not know what they should be doing, and thus fall short in doing what they should be doing. Others know but still do not do, and others have thought the Lord Jesus is taking too long and have sought to set up God's kingdom, resulting in the beating of fellow servants into subjection. (Luke 12:45-48)  The traditions taken from the Greeks and Romans are so embellished with scripture quotations, that the vast majority accept them without further investigation. As a result, for many, worship of God is — to some extent — “in vain.” It was similar with the religious people of Jesus’ day, to whom he said: “Hypocrites! Well did Isaiah prophesy concerning you, saying: ‘This people draws near to me with their mouth, and honor me with their lips, but their heart is far from me. And in vain they worship me, teaching as doctrines the commandments of men.” (Matthew 15:8,9) Such as these, despite all their protestations to contrary, have not yet come to fully understand the true gospel, nor the God who reveals this gospel to us.

I am Jehovah, that is my name. — Isaiah 42:8, American Standard Version

(14) While modern Bible translations may hide it, God’s Holy Name does appear in the Hebrew Bible over 7,000 times. His name in Hebrew is written by four letters. These Hebrew letters are often called the “Tetragrammaton.” These four letters correspond roughly with the English/Latin letters YHWH, JHUH or JHVH. The Jews began in interpret various scriptures in such a way that they became superstitious regarding the pronouncing of this name, thus they began to substitute forms of the titles ADON/KURIOS (Lord) and EL/THEOS (God) wherever God’s name appeared. Christians adopted this custom from the apostate Jews, and thus, in English and many other languages, we do not see an actual rendering of God’s name very often. The reason for this is that most translators substitute either “the LORD” or “GOD” for his name. In the popular King James Version, we can find it rendered as JEHOVAH directly based on the Masoretic Hebrew text in four places. The first is Exodus 6:3, which reads: “And I appeared unto Abraham, unto Isaac, and unto Jacob by the name of God Almighty, but by my name JEHOVAH was I not known to them.” And again in Psalm 83:18: “That men may know that thou, whose name alone is JEHOVAH, art the most high over all the earth.” The other two occurrences of his name in the King James Version are Isaiah 12:2 and Isaiah 26:4. However, in most places in the King James Version, God’s name have been changed to "LORD", “the LORD” or “GOD” (in all capital letters to denote that the translators substituted such for the Holy Name in those instances). Many other English Bible translations do similar.

(15) Some translations render God’s Holy Name as “Yahweh.” This form, although often heralded as being “Hebrew”, is actually a Latin form based on sounds attributed to a Greek variation of the Holy Name. Nevertheless, either Latin form is acceptable, just as most people accept several forms of other names. The name of our Savior, for instance, is usually rendered in English as “Jesus”, based on a Latin form, which in turn, is based on a Greek form. However, as based on the Hebrew, that same name is usually rendered as “Joshua” or “Jeshua”. Nevertheless, the English “Yahweh” is based on a Greek form of the Holy Name, while the form “Jehovah” is based on the Masoretic Hebrew text. Both are the same name, but expressed in different Latin forms.

(16) There are some professed Christians who do pronounce God’s Holy Name often, but turn around and misrepresent that name by what they teach. Just using and expressing a form of God’s Holy Name does not mean that those who do so are truly bringing honor to that name in all that they teach. Some constantly use a form of the Holy Name, but misrepresent that name as representing as a very cruel God, ready to eternally destroy earth’s present billions because they fail to listen or understand a certain message due their being blinded. In so doing, they are actually bringing reproach upon his name.

(17) The question is, however, should we substitute “Lord” or “God” for his name? The ancient Hebrews several times sought also to substitute God’s name with a Chaldee form of “Lord” that is, “Baal.” This was actually used as the name of a false idol-god. Jehovah said of various ones who claimed to be “prophets”, that they forsook Jehovah God of their fathers, who had brought them out of the land of Egypt; and they followed other gods from among the gods of the people who were all around them, and they bowed down to them; and they provoked Jehovah’s anger. They forsook Jehovah and served Baal [Lord] and the Ashtoreths, which resulted in the anger of Jehovah against Israel. (Judges 2:13,14; 3:7; 10:6,10) And again in Jeremiah’s time, Jehovah spoke against those who were causing God’s people to forget His Name, just as their forefathers had forgotten His name for Baal [Lord]. (Jeremiah 23:27) Since the Bible nowhere tells anyone to change God’s eternal Holy Name to other words, we have no reason to think that Jehovah approves of the popular custom of substituting “the Lord” (or, “God”) for his name any more than he approved of how his people in times passed substituted Baal (Lord) for his name. Indeed, such actually changes the Holy Name to either “the LORD” or to “GOD”. Nevertheless, none of us are given authority to judge other brothers in Christ over whether they pronounce the Holy Name as "LORD", "GOD", "JEHOVAH", "YAHWEH", etc. Jesus has been given authority from his God to judge the hearts of men, and Jehovah will certainly use him to, in due time, set all matters straight.

(18) Many claim that one should not pronounce the Holy Name because we don’t know for a certainty how it was originally pronounced. However, should we neglect to use his name simply because we are not sure how it was originally pronounced? Nevertheless, we don’t know of anyone who actually does not give some pronunciation to the Holy Name. Substituting “the LORD”, “GOD”, “ADONAI”, “HASHEM”, etc., actually means that one IS pronouncing the Holy Name by those words, and thereby definitely misrepresenting, as well as mispronouncing, the Holy Name. There have been many arguments presented for pronouncing God’s name one way or another, usually based on some kind of theory of how it was originally pronounced in ancient Hebrew. Some small groups have even went so far as to make individual salvation dependent upon using whatever pronunciation they have chosen for his name, again, something which no where authorized in the Bible. However, if this were true, some people in certain lands may loose out simply because they do not have the same sounds in their language; as a result their pronunciation would be different. For instance, many orientals do not have a sound for “W” in their language. Therefore, they end up pronouncing the “W” similar to a “V”. To make salvation dependent upon a certain pronunciation is very narrow-minded, and we have no reason to believe that God is doing so. — See our studies on God’s Holy Name.

The Attributes of Jehovah

\(19) But having shown that the God of the Bible is Jehovah (Yahweh), what kind of God is he? How is he described in the Bible? What kind of attributes does He have?

(20) The scriptures declare a “beginning of the creation of God.” (Revelation 3:14) His qualities and attributes of character were the same then as they are now, since the very name of the Creator means he is who he is; like His Son, God cannot deny Himself as to Who He Is. (Exodus 3:14; 2 Timothy 2:13) Thus, He is constant in His attributes. This is also expressed when God told Israel: “For I, Jehovah, don’t change; therefore you, sons of Jacob, are not consumed.” — Malachi 3:6.

(21) The completeness of the divine perfection is revealed in the Bible as such that companionship is not necessary to the happiness of Jehovah. The one who “inhabits eternity” is self-centered. (Isaiah 57:15) The creation of angels and of man was indeed his pleasure, because, lovingly, he desires to do good, to give capacity for pleasure and to afford it opportunity for gratification. (Revelation 4:11) Furthermore, the highest good of his creatures calls for an exhibition to the full of all the elements of the divine personal qualities divine justice, love, power and wisdom.

Is Jehovah Omnipresent?

“And there is no creature hidden from his sight, but all things are naked and open to Him to whom we must give account.” — Hebrews 4:13.

(22) Omnipresence is defined as “present in all places at all times.” Usually this is defined as that God’s very being – his substance or body – is present in all places at all times. We need to be very careful in going into extremes either way concerning this. At the same time we should allow the scriptures complete harmony. The Bible teaches a personal God – a great Spirit Being. The Bible, in some places, appear to give Him a home, or locality. It was Jesus who taught us to pray, “Our Father, who is in heaven.” (Matthew 6:9) Jesus spoke of the “Father who is in heaven” many times. (Matthew 5:16,45,48; 6:1; 7:11,21; 10:32,33; 12:50; 16:17; 18:10,14,19; 23:9; Mark 11:25,26; Luke 11:2) And then again we read: “Jehovah looked down from heaven on the children of men.” (Psalm 14:2) “God is in heaven, and you on earth.” (Ecclesiastes 5:2) “Jehovah is in his holy temple. Jehovah is on his throne in heaven.” (Psalm 11:4) And yet the declaration of the Bible respecting the Creator’s presence is that “the eyes of Jehovah are in every place, beholding the evil and the good.” (Proverbs 15:3) “Don’t I fill heaven and earth? says Jehovah.” (Jeremiah 23:24) He certainly has the ability to take knowledge of his creatures in all place at all times, and he is able to be in a multitude of places at the same time, whether the very being of his mighty spiritual body is present in all places at all times or not. We, therefore, make no commitment either way on the matter of His actually being present absolutely everywhere at that same time at all times, for this is a matter not absolutely stated either way in the Bible.

(23) Nevertheless, with this in mind, we should guard ourselves against an unscriptural thought in connection with our heavenly Father, that God’s very being is omnipresent in absolutely every place in absolutely all creation, which in effect, would be equal to saying that all creation is a part of God's being. This unscriptural declaration has been fruitful in producing much confusion and error, and may safely, therefore, be attributed to our arch-enemy and adversary, the devil. It seemingly honors God, but in reality paves the way to His dishonor and to the confusion of His people. As an illustration of the confusion that may come from this false doctrine of such an omnipresence of God note the absurdity built upon it by the theosophists, Christian Scientists and, to some extent, by others, errors to which those are liable who receive this kind of doctrine of omnipresence as scriptural.

(24) Thus the argument as used by some of those referred to is that God is everywhere present, therefore, He is in this stone, He is in that piece of wood, He is in that piece of metal, He is in the body of mankind, sinner and saint alike, He is in the horse or the sheep, He is everywhere. Taken to extremes, some have concluded that all of God’s creation IS God Almighty Himself! Such is absurdity and definitely not scriptural! Who could believe it, do you say? Sad to say, forms of this belief is held by many, and it can also be found among many who profess to be Christians. Some also have, in effect, asked, in what way is God in the wood, in the stones, in the iron, or in the trees, in the sheep or in the dog? and they answer their own question, saying, God merely signifies good, and in one sense of the word good is useful; hence, to say that God is in the wood is merely to say that there is something useful in that wood. It can either be used in the construction of buildings or furniture or as fuel, there is something good in it. The same way the argument applies to animals, metals, minerals; according to this theory, they are all good for something, and if good means God, then God is in them all. All of this reasoning, however, is not found in the Bible.

(25) Getting back to the statement in Proverbs 15:3, we note that it speaks of God’s ability to see both good and evil. This statement implies that there are things evil as well as good. There are things that God approves and things that he disapproves. The fact that Jehovah has knowledge of all conditions of things is not out of harmony with the other facts that he permits conditions of which he disapproves, and which he declares that he will ultimately destroy. “All the wicked he will destroy.” — Psalm 145:20.

(26) A view that appears to be in harmony with the scriptures is that God’s bodily being dwells in the heavens, but that his spirit or power permeates in all places. While the scriptures say that God dwells, or is in, the followers of Jesus (1 Corinthians 6:16; 1 John 4:4), we also read that God’s spirit lives in the believer. (1 Corinthians 3:16; 6:19) This would, then, give evidence that God’s presence is by means of His Spirit. Assuming that this is the correct conclusion, we can further see that He has given this power to be present in more place than one to his Son Jesus (Matthew 28:18; Luke 10:22; John 3:35; 5:22-27; 1 Corinthians 15:27), else how could Jesus say to his disciples: “I am with you always, even to the end of the age.” (Matthew 28:20) How is Jesus present with the disciples? The scriptures indicate that he is present by means of the holy spirit, which spirit was given to Jesus by his God. — 1 John 3:24; 4:13; Acts 1:4; 2:33; John 15:26; See also: John 14:17,26; Acts 1:5,8; 9:31; Romans 8:1,9-17; 1 Corinthians 3:16; 6:19; 2 Corinthians 1:22; 3:3; 12:18; Philippians 2:1; 2 Timothy 1:14.

God’s Arch-Enemy

(27) The Bible also tells us about a self-exalted enemy of God, a being called “Satan.” He is spoken of as “the god of this age.” (2 Corinthians 4:4) He now works in the “hearts of the children of disobedience.” (Ephesians 2:2) This implies Satan’s ability to have his presence or power felt in more than one place at once. Being a mighty spirit being, we have no reason to assume that Satan is so limited as not to have this ability, for he is described as “deceiving the entire world.” (Revelation 12:9) Satan is also referred to as Beelzebub [meaning, Lord of the flies], the “ruler of the demons.” (Matthew 12:24-28) These words imply that there are other evil spirit beings, of whom Satan is the ruler and through whom he is working.

(25) Certain statements are made respecting Satan which would not usually be applied to a principle of evil, or to a working of error. For instance, Jesus declared that Satan was a “murderer” from the beginning and a “liar.” (John 8:44) Errors and principles are not murderers and liars. It would be a misuse of language to make such an application. Only an intelligent being can be a murderer or a liar. Hence the whole tenor of the Scriptures upholds the assertion that there is such a being as Satan and that he is in opposition to the living and true God. In 1 Corinthians 11:13-15, Satan is spoken of masquerading as an "angel of light". The context indicates that this is speaking of a real person just as "his servants" are real persons. In 1 John 3:8-10, the children of the devil are contrasted with the children of God. This indicates that the devil is a person just the same as God is a person.

(26) If we were to suppose the everlasting continuance of Satan as a being, as an adversary of God, the matter would seem strange to us, because it is irreconcilable with our conception of divine power. We have the statement of the scriptures respecting Satan’s reign and his ultimate destruction. (Hebrews 2:14) With this information we have a reasonable, logical thought on the subject. When we consider the scriptural presentation further, that originally Satan was not an evil being, but that he made himself evil by the exercise of personal liberty and became the enemy of God, the subject seems to be clear and reasonable. In fact, this is the only rational solution to the problem of his existence. — See Ezekiel 28:13-15.

(27) To suppose that there is no personal Satan is to suppose that God has permitted his Word to deceive mankind in this respect, or that the devil is a manifestation of God himself — a position unthinkable. Nor is it logical to say there is a devil, an opponent of God, and at the same time maintain that God is all things, or that God is present in all things. But we do not find this latter statement to be Biblical. The scriptural proposition is that at the close of the millennial age, when Christ will have destroyed sin and Satan, and when the empire of the universe will be in absolute harmony, then God will be all in all. (1 Corinthians 15:28) To all eternity there will be no opposition to his will. There is opposition now, however, in many places and at many times. But ultimately, Jehovah will have full control.

The Omnipotence of Jehovah

“Ah, Lord Jehovah! Look, you have made the heavens and the earth by Your great power and outstretched arm. There is nothing too hard for You.” — Jeremiah 32:17

(28) To say that God is “all” power is sophistry of language which often misleads the one questioning as well as the one attempting to answer him. The statement could be thought to mean that God’s entire being is nothing but power. If God is “all” power, then he is not love or justice, or wisdom. He would thus be limited to the one great attribute of power, or force, and nothing else. Such cannot be the thought entertained by any logical mind. It is, nevertheless, a form of expression that is often used, perhaps unintentionally, but very injurious to the reasoning faculties.

(29) We can say that God is “all power” only in that in him is the source of all power. There is no power — no might* — in the entire universe, aside of him, and no power exists that does not come from him. However, this should not be meant to be understood as saying that God is nothing but power. God is all-powerful. He has the ability to exercise power in any direction to the extent that he wills. If he had chosen, he could have so created Satan that he could not think or do other than in the harmony with the divine will; or he could have exercised his power to crush the adversary and thus have destroyed him long ago. But he has permitted Satan to exist for six thousand years, in the sense that he does not completely restrain the devil from doing evil. The scriptures do tell us, however, that God will eventually destroy him.
==========
*The Hebrew word for “God” signifies might, strength, power. As applied to He who is the source of all power, might, it takes on the meaning of “Supreme Being.” (John 17:1,3; 1 Corinthians 8:6) See our study: The Hebraic Usage of the Titles for "God".

(30) The scope of the exercise of divine power is the universe, but it is difficult for our finite minds to comprehend the meaning of this word universe, especially as it applies to absolutely everything that exists. In the material universe alone, astronomers tell us that by the aid of their radio telescopes they can see trillions upon trillions of stars with possible planets traveling around them similar to our solar system. Many of these planets, some believe, are in the process of development and are being prepared for inhabitants, whom the Creator will in due time provide. From the scriptural standpoint, however, the great work of human creation began with our earth. What a boundless thought we have in the mere suggestion that billions, perhaps trillions of planets may become inhabited with people, that the lessons of righteousness and sin, of life and death eternal, now being taught to humanity, will never need to be repeated! — Isaiah 65:17.

(31) We stand appalled at the immensity of space and at the law and order which everywhere reigns! We heartily assent to the words of the prophet David: “Day unto day utters speech, and night unto night reveals knowledge. There is no speech or language where their voice is not heard.” (Psalm 19:2,3) The person who can look upon this wonderful display of superhuman power and believe that these immense heavenly bodies created themselves, shows that he has allowed his mind to become sadly disordered, unbalanced.

(32) As scientific instruments demonstrate to us the immensity of the universe, we perceive that the prophet used very moderate language indeed in his description of the majestic power and greatness of the Creator, when he represents Jehovah as weighing the mountains in his balance and holding the seas in the hollow of his hand. (Isaiah 40:12) From Jehovah’s standpoint, a thousand years are but as a watch in the night. (Psalm 90:4) If, as we realize the immensity of the universe, we are made to feel insignificantly small in comparison, how much more we feel such insignificance in the presence of our God! No wonder some great men are inclined to say that humanity is too insignificant from the divine standpoint to be worthy of the least consideration much less to be objects of divine care and providence! — Psalm 8:3,4.

The Omniscience of Jehovah

“Do you know the balance of clouds, those wondrous works of Him who is perfect (complete) in knowledge? — Job 37:16.

(33) To say that God is all knowledge could also be seen as an inaccurate statement. If God were all knowledge, how could he have the attribute of power? God has all knowledge, possesses all knowledge; but this is a different matter. If we say: “The boy has a hoop,” we do not mean that he is a hoop. To be a hoop and to have a hoop are not the same. God is omniscient; that is, he knows all things. This very fact proves that he is a personal God. There can be no knowledge without personality. Knowledge implies cognizance of external things. Among the things outside the divine Person are things both good and evil.

(34) When we read that God created man in his own image and likeness (Genesis 1:26,27), we may know that man is not God. He was merely made in the image of God. Because God is perfect, therefore the human being made in his image would be satisfactory to God. That human being had knowledge. But that first human being neglected the Word of God, and thus he learned something by his neglect. What he learned is mentioned in the scriptures. “He is become as one of us [one of the Elohim (Genesis 3:5) — the spirit beings are all called elohim, gods, that is, mighty ones — Psalm 8:5; Hebrews 2:7], to know good and evil.” (Genesis 3:22) This statement proves that God knows of both good and evil.

(35) Isaiah 40:13,14 describes Jehovah’s omniscience: “Who had directed the spirit of Jehovah, or who as his counselor has taught Him? With whom did He take counsel, and who instructed Him, and taught Him in the path of justice? Who taught Him knowledge, and showed him the way of understanding?” The plain implication here is that no one in all creation can teach the all-knowing Jehovah.

(36) The prophet Isaiah says of God: “Truly you are a God who hides yourself.” (Isaiah 45:15) How true! As a result the world by its wisdom does not know God. (1 Corinthians 1:21; 2:7,8) He is near in his wisdom and love, yet he can be seen only by those whose eyes of understanding have been opened. (Matthew 13:13,16; 1 Corinthians 2:10) But we are glad that the time is coming when all the blind eyes will see clearly. “As truly as I live,” says Jehovah, “all the earth will be filled with glory of Jehovah.” “The earth will be filled with knowledge of the glory of Jehovah, as the waters cover the sea.” (Numbers 14:21; Habakkuk 2:14) Then all will see what God has been doing, and the temporary blindness will but accentuate the glorious brightness of his wisdom, justice, love and power. — Isaiah 25:7,8.

“God Is Love”
1 John 4:8

(37) God is love in the sense that the term love represents the central principle of all the divine personal attributes. Love is not an attribute of God’s substance, his spiritual body; it is an attribute of — for lack of a better word — His character. Some would turn John’s statement around, and have it mean something that we are sure that John did not intend. They would declare that “Love IS God" evidently with the meaning that God must love everyone and everything, and some even present the idea that there has always been other living beings with God so that he could express love. In other words, they claim that since God IS love, he had to have someone with to express that love from eternity past. John, however, did not say that, nor did John say that God HAS to display love to another living creature in order to BE God. In context, John was saying that there is nothing in all the attributes of God, or the actions of God, that is contrary to His love. The scriptures do not teach there is nothing except love and that God is everywhere thus that love is everywhere. But they teach that God is a loving person. This does not negate the other statements that God is just, wise and powerful. But this quality of love best of all represents His divine character. All of his justice is in harmony with his love. He does not exercise his justice or power contrary to his love, for all his attributes work together for good to all his creatures.

(38) The scriptures encourage us to reason from the known to the unknown. (Romans 1:20; Psalm 19:1,2) They tell us that although God is so great, so wise, so powerful, he is also just and loving. (Deuteronomy 32:4; Psalm 9:15; Exodus 34:6) And the more we consider the matter, the more reasonable the Bible description of the Almighty appears. His power we see demonstrated. The wisdom of One so great cannot be doubted. When we come to consider, could One so wise and so powerful be unjust or ungenerous? Our hearts answer, No! No one is really great who is devoid of justice and love. So surely as our God is Jehovah, he must possess these qualities.

(39) All the power, all the justice, all the wisdom of God must be used in accordance with his greatest attribute, which is love. It will therefore be a loving wisdom, a loving justice, which he will use toward all creation in the exercise of his loving power for their good. He created man. (Genesis 1:27;2:4) He permitted Adam to disobey his law, telling us that he knew in advance what man would do and that he permitted man to do wrong. — Isaiah 46:9,10.

(40) In permitting sin to enter the world, God had several ends in view. Both man and angels will have benefited by His permission of sin. (1 Corinthians 1:4:9; 1 Peter 1:12) Man will also learn the results of living a life without God, which results in bondage to corruption and vanity. (Ecclesiastes 1:2; 6:11,12; 3:9,10; 8:9; Isaiah 2:4-4) But most importantly Jehovah’s name will finally be glorified worldwide. (Isaiah 12:4,5) God could do all this because he foreknew that he would make provision for man’s release from the curse of vanity and death. (Romans 8:19-22) This release will come by means of a resurrection from the dead. “As in Adam all die, even in Christ will all be made alive.” 1 Corinthians 15:21,22.

(41) We can only appreciate these matters if we take the Bible as a whole. If we look at isolated scriptures we might find ourselves teaching either universalism on the one hand, or claiming that God has no wisdom in allowing evil, or what not. We would get into all sorts of confusion. But when we see the perfect adjustment of God’s justice, wisdom, love and power, and realize that he has good purposes respecting the evil, that he has fully marked out what it will do and what it will not do, either in its present influence, or its ultimate influence, this gives us confidence in the personal attributes of Jehovah.

The Permission of Evil

(42) From only one standpoint can divine wisdom and love be discerned in connection with the history of mankind. It must include the age about to be ushered in the period of Messiah’s reign of righteousness. This will the time when every member of Adam’s race, sharing the penalty of sin and death because of inheriting his weaknesses, will be set free from these; the time when full knowledge of the glory of Jehovah will be granted to every human being, and when a full opportunity will come to each, by obedience, to live in an Eden-like paradise for all eternity. — Isaiah 29:18-20; Revelation 20:2,3; 12,13.

******below still may need to be edited

(43) The lesson thus far taught is the goodness and the severity of God his goodness in bringing us into being, and his severity in the punishment of father Adam’s willful transgression; also to both men and angels, justice, unswerving justice. The next lesson to be taught to God’s intelligent creatures is that God is love. The foundation for these lessons is already laid in the ransom sacrifice of Jesus, through and on account of which he becomes the world’s redeemer and restorer. A few can believe this message by faith. But not many have the ear of faith or the eye of faith. Only the truly dedicated ones are able to appreciate this great fact at the present time. — Matthew 11:15; 13:11; 7:13,14.


(44) That which is now secret and understood only by the few is shortly to be made manifest to every creature in heaven and in earth. All will then be able to appreciate the great fact that the redemption accomplished by the sacrifice of Jesus is worldwide and means a full deliverance from the sin and death condemnation which passed upon Adam and all of his race, to all who will accept the same as a gift from God. The remainder will be destroyed in the second death. For scriptural proofs for these statements, please see study: Understanding Kingdom Mysteries.


The Second Death – The Essence of Wisdom


Revelation 20:14,15; Psalm 37:9,10


(45) As for the second death, we easily see that if God created man in his own image, man must of necessity have originally had the ability to decide for himself; otherwise he would not have been in God’s image. If man was created with this ability, he must have the power or privilege to will to do wrong as well as right. If he exercises his power in the direction of evil, God has the power to destroy him. On the other hand, if he lives in harmony with righteousness God has the power to grant him life to all eternity.


(46) The destruction of the wicked in the second death is the essence of wisdom. As to the declaration that God is too pure to look upon evil (Habakkuk 1:13), the thought of the Hebrew text seems to be that God’s personal qualities is so pure and so righteous that he will not continue to look upon evil. He will not permit evil to all eternity, for this condition would not be pleasing to him.


(47) This very thought implies that there is evil to look upon. If not so, how could he look upon it? Ultimately all evil will be destroyed. Ultimately all creatures which are “in heaven and on earth and such as are in the sea” will be heard saying: “Blessing and honor and glory and power, be unto him that sits upon the throne, and unto the Lamb forever and ever.” — Revelation 5:13.

Wednesday, July 28, 2021

John 14:24 - Did Jesus Disclaim Being the Word of God?

By Ronald R. Day

John 14:24 - He who doesn't love me doesn't keep my words. The word which you hear isn't mine, but the Father's who sent me. 

It has been claimed that Jesus, by his words recorded in John 14:24, was denying that he is the Logos of John 1:1-15, and evidently also of Revelation 19:13.

John 1:14,15,29,30 definitely shows that the Logos spoken in John 1:1 is the Son of God, Jesus. Denying that the Logos became flesh, or that when the Logos became flesh he ceased being the Logos does not actually fit what is stated.

The name "Logos of God" -- applied to Jesus -- signifies one who speaks, who delivers, the words of God. Of course, Jesus is not literally "the Word." Revelation 19:13 shows that this is a titular name. A comparison can be made in that Jesus also refers to himself as "the truth". (John 14:6) Does this mean that Jesus is literally "the truth"? Obviously, Jesus is referring to himself as the embodiment of truth related to his God and Father, Jehovah. (Micah 5:4; Ephesians 1:3) Jesus reflects the glory of his God perfectly, and he came to declare the truth about His God. (John 1:18; 1 John 5:20) Thus, in the same manner, Jesus is the embodiment of Word of His God, for he represents his God and speaks the words of his God, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. (Exodus 3:13,14; Deuteronomy 18:15-19; Isaiah 61:1; John 3:34; 5:19; 6:29; 7:16,28; 8:26,28,42; 10:36; 12:44-50; 14:10,24; 17:1,3,8; Acts 3:13-26; 1 Corinthians 8:6; Galatians 4:4; Hebrews 1:1,2; 1 John 4:9,10) This is what Jesus actually claimed in John 14:24, that the words he spoke on behalf of his God were not his own words, but that of his God. Thus, instead of not identifying himself as being the Logos of God, Jesus was actually stating that he is the Logos of his God. 

Saturday, July 3, 2021

Ephesians 4:30 - Grieve Not the Holy Spirit

 And grieve not the holy Spirit of God, whereby ye are sealed unto the day of redemption. -- Ephesians 4:30, King James Version.

Many trinitarians (and some others) may point to Ephesians 4:30 as proof that the Holy Spirit is a person. "God," however, in the expression, "the holy spirit of God", obviously is referring to only one person, and the "holy spirit" is presented as be a possession of that one person who is God. This is in harmony with Ephesians 4:6, where only the Father is presented as being  the "one God". Likewise in Ephesians 4:13, "God" is again presented as being only one person, and "Christ" (meaning the anointed) is distinguished from being that one person, since he is presented as being the son of that one person. 

The scriptures show that God's Holy Spirit is is likened to God's finger, at least in as God's Holy Spirit represents the power of God. (Matthew 12:28; Luke 11:20) One's finger is, of course, and extension of one's self, but one would not say that one's finger is another person of oneself. Regardless, what one's finger does is what is directed by the owner of that finger; what is done by one's finger is what is done by the person to whom the finger belongs. Likewise, with God and and His Holy Spirit. The point is that as one's finder is an extension of the person to whom the finger belongs, so God's Holy Spirit is an extension of God to whom the Holy Spirit belongs. God's Holy Spirit could be used as an extension of God as more or less figuratively being God's mouth, His eyes, His ears, His heart, His disposition, His will, etc. Of course, God's Holy Spirit, being an extension of God Himself, could certainly be spoken of as as being grieved. This does not mean that we need to imagine, assume, add to, and read into the scriptures that God is three persons, and that His Holy Spirit is one of the persons of Himself.

Because of their desire to make God's Holy Spirit appear to be a person, many translations add a personal pronoun to the Bible in this verse (and many other verses pertaining to the Holy Spirit). For instance, the New King James Version adds the pronoun "whom":

And do not grieve the Holy Spirit of God, by whom you were sealed for the day of redemption.

In the Greek, the word for spirit is neuter, and thus, in harmony with the Koine Greek syntax, all pronouns relating to spirit are neuter. IF the spirit were referring to a person, it could still be neuter in the Greek.  One cannot depend on the gender of pronouns in the Koine Greek to determine whether an object is referring to a person or not. Thus, supplying the pronoun "whom" in an English translation does not mean that we need to imagine and assume the God's Holy Spirit is actually a "him", a masculine person. There is certainly no reason to add to what Paul wrote anywhere in Ephesians 4 that the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob is three persons, and that one those persons is God's Holy Spirit.

John 14:16,26; 15:26 – The Comforter – Is It A Person?

 (This study has not yet been fully edited; links may not work)

In John 14:16, we read, “I will pray the Father, and He shall give you  another Comforter, even the Spirit of Truth”. And again in John 14:26, “but the Comforter, the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, He shall teach you all things”. And again in John 15:26, “When the Comforter is come, whom I will send unto you from the Father, even the Spirit of truth, which proceedeth from the Father, He shall testify of me”.

The claim is that in all three of these passages, we have a perfect statement of  the three Divine Persons, acting in perfect unity, yet each Person in the same relative position – the Father as the Fountain of all authority; the Son as obeying the Father, revealing, and teaching, and praying, in His prophetic and priestly offices; and then the Holy Spirit proceeding from the Father, by the command of the Son, as the anointing and powerful Comforter.

As is always the case, in all of the scriptures referred to, one has to assume beyond what is written, and add to and read into those scriptures the idea of the three divine persons in one God.

Most translations refer to the holy spirit in the above scriptures in the masculine. It is only in reference to the holy spirit as the comforter that the masculine is ever used in the Greek concerning the holy spirit. All other references to the holy spirit, in the Greek, is neuter. This has to do with the way the Greek language is expressed, and in no instance can one use one or the other Greek gender used to prove that the holy spirit is or is not a person.

In 1 John 4:2, John states: “By this you know the Spirit of God.” When he uses the word “God” in this verse, is he speaking of “God” as a unipersonal God, or is he speaking of “God” as three persons? Most trintarians will say that “God” here refers to the “God the Father,” without thinking about how this makes the God to whom the holy spirit belongs as one person, not three. Indeed, all through the New Testament, God is most often used to refer the God and Father of Jesus as one person, not three persons.

The Bible reveals the holy spirit as a extension of God, figuratively as his finger, his mouth. (Matthew 12:28; Luke 11:20; 1 Kings 8:24; 2 Chronicles 6:4; 36:12,21; Ezra 1:1; Isaiah 1:20; 40:5; 45:23; 48:3; 58:14; 62:2; Jeremiah 9:12,20; Ezekiel 33:7; Micah 4:4; Matthew 4:4; Mark 12:36; Acts 1:17; 28:25; Hebrews 3:7; 9:8; 10:15,16; 2 Peter 1:21) As such it does indeed have the attributes of personality of its Owner, the unipersonal God. However, the scriptures never, ever, reveal the holy spirit to be a separate and distinct person of its Owner. Such an idea has to be assumed, added to and read into the expressions used of God’s holy spirit.

As regards the rendering in English, since the masculine usage in the verses should not be considered as stating that the Comforter is  a person, then the verses can be understood as: John 14:16-26: “I will pray to the Father, and He shall give you  another Comforter, even the Spirit of Truth”. “but the Comforter, the Holy Spirit, which the Father will send in my name that will teach you all things”. And again in John 15:26, “When the Comforter is come which I will send unto you from the Father, even the Spirit of truth, which proceeds from the Father, that will testify of me”.

Related Studies:

Isaiah 61:1 — The Spirit of Yahweh On the Anointed One

Ephesians 3:11-15 - Must We See Trinity in What Paul Wrote?

2 Corinthians 1:21,22 – Christ, God and the Spirit

Romans 8:9 – Spirit of God and Spirit of Christ

Romans 5:5,6 – God’s Love, Holy Spirit, Christ’s Death

Acts 5:3,4 – Ananias Lied to God, Not to Men

Links to Other Bible Students’ Sites

How Does the Holy Spirit Work? (Christian Questions Radio)

Does the Holy Spirit Speak? (Christian Questions Radio)

***********