Wednesday, February 4, 2026

The First Noel

  Traditionally, the word “Noel” has come to be a synonym for “Christmas”, and many dictionaries define the word “Noel” as such. Thus, by tradition, the word has come to signify Christmas. Dictionaries usually link Noel etymologically with the Latin natalis, which means “nativity” or “birth”. Usually, dictionaries seem to ignore the EL in Noel when giving the etymology of the word. However, some associate Noel with the Latin “DIES NATALIS”, which, in effect, means “birthday” of “day of birth”.  This would seem to, in some vague manner, appear to link “el” with “day”, which we suspect is done because of the tradition of celebrating Jesus’ birth on some specified day, such as December 25 or January 7.  EL in Hebrew and many other ancient languages means God or mighty.   Nevertheless, many claim the Noel means “birth of God,” although EL could simply mean "mighty one", as a king. The idea is based on trinitarian or other concepts that teach that God Almighty became a man; thus, by this means it is claimed that God himself was born into the world of mankind. At any rate, by extension, to some, Noel has come to mean “birthday of God”. 


We have also found references to the “noel log”, “noel” being used almost as a synonym for “yule”.
http://tinyurl.com/8ofs4h

English-speaking Christians rarely speak of the “birth of God” in normal conversation. However, this may not be so of Christians who speak other languages. In Spanish, for instance, one may often hear of “Navidad de Dios”, meaning the birth of God. Thus, many Spanish-speaking people may speak of Christmas as “God's birthday”, based on how the Christmas celebration is sometimes called “Navidad de Dios” (or sometimes simply “Navidad Dios), that is, “God's birth[day]”.

Many, however, do speak of Christmas as being the “incarnation of God”, which is similar to saying “birth of God”. 

Of the Almighty Jehovah, we read:

1 Chronicles 16:36 - Blessed be Jehovah, the God of Israel, From everlasting even to everlasting. And all the people said, Amen, and praised Jehovah.

Psalms 41:13 - Blessed be Jehovah, the God of Israel, From everlasting and to everlasting. Amen, and Amen.

Thus, the Almighty Jehovah has never been conceived, begotten, or brought into existence, nor does he ever die. The Bible never says anything to the effect that Jehovah, the Most High has ever been born as a human being, as is often imagined by trinitarians, as well as some others.

Let us then examine the lyrics of one of the popular songs often sung at Christmas time entitled, "The First Noel." We do not know for a certainty who originally wrote this song. We will examine the words of what is probably the most popular vesion of this song.

The first verse:
The First Noel, the Angels did say
Was to certain poor shepherds in fields as they lay
In fields where they lay keeping their sheep
On a cold winter's night that was so deep.
Noel, Noel, Noel, Noel
Born is the King of Israel!

While we cannot be certain what meaning was originally given to the word NOEL as used in this song, we can say that to many, it refers to the birthday of God. Of course, the Bible says nothing about a birth or birthday of God Almighty, but we do find in the Bible that an angel proclaimed the birth of one whom Jehovah anointed to be the King of Israel:

Coutesy
The Edge Group and Lion Hudson Ltd
Luke 2:8 There were shepherds in the same country staying in the field, and keeping watch by night over their flock.
Luke 2:9 Behold, an angel of Jehovah stood by them, and the glory of Jehovah shone around them, and they were terrified.
Luke 2:10 The angel said to them, "Don'“ be afraid, for behold, I bring you good news of great joy which will be to all the people.
Luke 2:11 For there is born to you, this day, in the city of David, a Savior, who is Christ the Lord.
Luke 2:12 This is the sign to you: you will find a baby wrapped in strips of cloth, lying in a feeding trough."
Luke 2:13 Suddenly, there was with the angel a multitude of the heavenly host praising God, and saying,
Luke 2:14 "Glory to God in the highest, On earth peace, good will toward men."

The word "christ" means one anointed; the one who anointed Jesus is Jehovah. Prophetically, Jesus is depicted as saying: "Jehovah ...  anointed me." -- Isaiah 61:1.

“Noel” can only scripturally apply to the one sent by Jehovah if one also recognizes that EL can also be used in a general sense to denote a mighty person. As such, the word Noel would mean "Birth of a mighty one.” As ” babe, one may have difficulty thinking of Jesus as a mighty one, although it could be applied prophetically to his birth as the one promised who was to become the mighty everlasting King on the throne of David. Such a designation, however, would not mean that Jesus is Jehovah. Of course, we doubt that the author(s) of this hymn had any concept of using EL related to Jesus to mean a mighty one other than the Supreme Being.

Taking this further, if “no” in “noel" corresponds with the Greek forms of the word often transliterated as gennao (Strong's Greek #1080), it could take on the meaning of begettal, conception, as in Matthew 1:20. Indeed, Jesus conception would have taken place sometime around December 25, as many Bible Students have noted. Again, we note, however, the author(s) of this song probably did not have this in mind at all.

The lyrics continue:
They looked up and saw a star
Shining in the East beyond them far
And to the earth it gave great light
And so it continued both day and night.
There is nothing in the Bible that says that the shepherds saw a star shining in the East, much less that this star gave a great light. There was a light that appeared to the astrologers from the East, but the Bible does not say that this light* appeared to them on the night that Jesus was born, although that is a possibility. Nor is there any record in the Bible that this light was seen by others than the astrologers; the scriptures record only states that the astrologers saw this light, which led them first -- not to where Jesus was, but to Jerusalem, and evidently disappeared, since Matthew 2:9,10 relates that they again saw this light after they had spoken with Herod, and thus they rejoiced that they again saw this light.
==========
*called "star" in most translations, although the Greek word for "star“ has a greater application than what we today call a "star“. We highly doubt that what these astrologers actually saw was a "star“in the sense that "star" is defined by modern science.

The lyrics of “The First Noel” continue:
And by the light of that same star
Three Wise men came from country far
To seek for a King was their intent
And to follow the star wherever it went.
The Bible says nothing about "three wise men.” These astrologers indeed could be called "wise men”. The Bible does not relate how many astrologers came to see Jesus. They did indeed come from a "far far country" indicated by Matthew 2:7 and Matthew 2:16. The scriptures do not say how long it took them to reach Jerusalem, and then to go to Bethlehem. This trip may have extended over many months, or even years.

The lyrics continue:
This star drew nigh to the northwest
O'er Bethlehem it took its rest
And there it did both Pause and stay
Right o'er the place where Jesus lay.
This light led these astrologers to Jesus, but only after it had first led them to Jerusalem and to Herod. The Bible does not say that this light led these astrologers to "where Jesus lay," but rather that "they“ came into the house and saw the young child with Mary." (Matthew 2:11) By the time these astrologers found Jesus, Jesus was not lying in the manger, but was in a house as a young child.

Continuing with the lyrics:
Then entered in those Wise men three
Full reverently upon their knee
And offered there in His presence
Their gold and myrrh and frankincense.
The scriptural evidence is that this offering by the astrologers was sometime after Jesus was born.

The last verse reads:
Then let us all with one accord
Sing praises to our heavenly Lord
That hath made Heaven and earth of nought
And with his blood mankind has bought.
To the authors, this probably was meant to proclaim Jesus as being God of Genesis 1:1. To many, however, “heaven and earth” in Genesis 1:1 usually means the entire created universe, both visible and invisible. However, the Bible does not actually say that God created the physical universe from “nought/nothing.” Nevertheless, Jehovah did use his firstborn to bring forth the heavens (skies) and earth (land) as spoken of in Genesis 1.

Even so, the glory of the Almighty Jehovah has never been the glory of flesh and blood. The glory of man is a little lower than that of the angels. (Psalm 8:5; Hebrews 2:7) Thus, Jehovah could never buy mankind with His blood, since His spiritual “body” has never had any flesh or blood to offer to Himself for mankind. Paul distinctly keeps the celestial and terrestrial glories entirely separate.-- 1 Corinthians 15:39-41.

Of course, the life that Jesus had as a human was the life that Jehovah, the God and Father of Jesus (2 Corinthians 11:31; Ephesians 1:3; 1 Peter 1:3), had given to Jesus. Jesus said: “As the living Father sent me, and I live because of the Father.” -- John 6:57.

Jesus speaks of the glory that his God and Father had given to him as a human, which is probably the glory Jesus said he had given (reckonedly -- Romans 4:3,5,9,17,22-24) to his followers. -- John 17:22; Hebrews 2:9.

Hebrews 10:5 shows that Jesus' body of flesh, was prepared by his God and Father.

Only in this sense could Jesus' blood also be spoken of as the blood of his God and Father, although we doubt that the writers of the lyrics were thinking this way. It appears that their thought was that Jesus was the Almighty Jehovah Himself.
https://jesusnotyhwh.blogspot.com/p/posts.html

Conclusion: It should be evident that the lyrics to this popular Christmas carol are full of errors and were probably written to support the trinitarian dogma. Nevertheless, many of the words can be interpreted in other ways.

Maybe someone with musical or poetic abilities would like to reword the hymn to remove the errors.

See also our study:
Trinity and Christmas

Trinity and Christmas

 It is not uncommon to hear trinitarians speak of Christmas as the "birth of God," or even "God's birthday". Of course, Yahweh Himself has never been begotten, conceived, born, or brought into existence, since he has always been in existence. Nor has Yahweh ever been born as a human being, as is often imagined by trinitarians, as well as some others. Although many claim that some scriptures present a doctrine "incarnation", that is, that Jesus was the Most High and clothed himself with the flesh while still remaining the Most High, such a doctrine is not once actually presented in the Bible.


In effect, what is described by the "incarnation" doctrine would end up with the Jesus having two totally different sentiencies at once, for it is claimed that Jesus was and is omniscient, having a sentiency of abosolutely everything in the entire universe, while at the same time, Jesus, as a human, only had the sentiency of a human, and was thus not omnisicent. In reality, this would mean that Jesus himself is two persons, one with the omniscient sentiency, and one that does not have the omniscient sentiency.

Likewise, traditionally, the very celebration of "Christmas/Noel" has been associated with the false teaching of the "incarnation", indeed, "the Incarnation of God" is often used almost as a synonym for "Christmas/Noel", as can be seen from the following quotes:

"Christmas - The Incarnation of God."

"Christmas Incarnation" "the real meaning of Christmas -- the incarnation of God"

"Christmas - The Miracle of the Incarnation"

"The Christmas Miracle of the Incarnation of the Omnipresent Word"

"Christmas, the Incarnation, and the Communion


"Advent and Christmas draw our focus to the mystery of the Incarnation, of God becoming man."
http://thecatholicspirit.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=872&Itemid=108

"Christmas is the celebration of the incarnation of God."
http://www.cresourcei.org/cyxmas.html

"the account of incarnate deity.... " (The context shows that the author is using the word "deity" to mean the God of the Bible, the Most High.

"The Feast of the Incarnation... The incarnation of God."
http://www.virtualmuseum.ca/Exhibitions/Noel/angl/incarnat.htm

"a holiday celebrating the birth of God Incarnate."
http://brothersjuddblog.com/archives/2002/12/why_are_there_no_good_chanukah_1.html

"celebrates the birth of Christ and the wonderful mystery of the incarnation" "the good news of Christmas and the incarnation"
http://www.christchurch-cardiff.org.uk/show.pl?Magazine

"Birth of Christ, Incarnation, Nativity and Christmas"
http://www.abcog.org/xmas.htm

"Christmas is the church's celebration of the Incarnation, the supreme mystery that the holy and almighty God took on human flesh and was born in this world of the Virgin Mary."
http://www.stpaulskingsville.org/christmas.htm

"The incarnation of God becoming human and actually living among us is the Wonder of the Christmas story."
http://www.petrafel.org/images/message_transcript/The%20Wonder%20of%20Christmas.pdf

"Christmas focuses on the incarnation of Jesus" "The Incarnation, then, refers to God taking upon Himself a human form. So when Jesus was born into the world, Godfor one time in all human historybecame man!"
http://asiteforthelord.com/articles/theincarnationofjesus.doc

"The Christmas season celebrates the birth of Jesus Christ, the incarnation of God."
http://www.elca.org/Growing-In-Faith/Worship/Planning/Christmas.aspx

"The Christmas festival is about the incarnation of God"
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/george_pitcher/blog/2008/12/02/christmas_is_for_israel_too___

"the pinnacle of Advent comes with Christmas, when we celebrate the Incarnation of God. "
http://dotnettemplar.net/An+American+Catholics+Thoughts+On+Christmas.aspx

"the very heart and meaning of Christmas ... the wonder of the Incarnation (the birth of God-made-man Jesus)"
http://lichfieldcathedralschool.co.uk/newsmiscthe_chaplains_christmas_message.html

"The Christmas Marvel" "The birth of God! It took place in Bethlehem."
http://www.postchronicle.com/religion/article_212194723.shtml

Thus, by man's self-appointed "orthodox" traditional expression, the event described by the word "Christmas", which is often used as a translation and synonym of "Noel", is seen to mean the "incarnation of God," which, by extension, refers to "the birth of God." As such, "Christmas" is really proclaimed by most "Christians" to be a celebration of man's dogma that Jesus is God, especially that of the trinity doctrine, which dogma has to be added to and read into the scriptures. This dogma of man, in effect, would mean to make Jesus himself into an idol, since it ends up proclaiming the creature to possess the glory that only belongs to the Creator Most High.
http://godandson.reslight.net

The false dogma of man --the incarnation of God -- is also expressed in the Christmas carol, "Hark the Herald Angels Sing"

Veiled in flesh the Godhead see;
Hail th' Incarnate Deity,
Pleased as man with men to dwell
Jesus, our Emmanuel.
Hark! The herald angels sing, "Glory to the newborn King."

http://www.chespres.org/resources/sermons/ChesPres_20061224S.asp
http://wackyanne.tripod.com/musicrm/xmtrad2.htm
http://allspiritchristmas.co.uk/

Another carol, "In the Bleak Midwinter" says:

In the bleak midwinter a stable-place sufficed
The Lord God incarnate, Jesus Christ.

http://www.graceriverforest.org/download/school/Christmas.pdf

Another carol, "How Should A King Come" has the lines:

And a King lay hid in a virgins womb, and there were no crowds to see Him come.
At last in a barn in a manger of hay He came, and God incarnate lay!

http://www.dante.trieste.it/mediadante/anno06_07/caroles06.pdf

Since all of these expressions, and the whole idea that Jesus is the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob is false, giving Jesus worship that only belongs to the his God is, in effect, idolatry. Yes, we should "flee from idolatry".
http://idolatry.reslight.net/

How Should a Christian View Thanksgiving and Christmas?

I have also found references to the pagan "noel log", "noel" being used almost as a synonym for "yule".
"Noel Log" and Pagan
"Yule Log" and Pagan



Some related books (I do not necessarily agree with all conclusions given by these authors):

Pagan Christmas: The Plants, Spirits, and Rituals at the Origins of Yuletide

Christmas In Ritual and Tradition: Christian and Pagan

Restoring the Biblical Christ: Is Jesus God?

Divine Truth or Human Tradition? - A Reconsideration of the Roman-Protestant Docrtine of the Trinity


CLICK HERE
 to post comments, questions, etc. on our "Jesus and His God" Discuss

Sunday, January 18, 2026

Zechariah 12:8 -- As HaElohim, As an Angel of Jehovah

In that day shall Jehovah defend the inhabitants of Jerusalem; and he that is feeble among them at that day shall be as David; and the house of David shall be as God [ha elohim], as the angel of Jehovah before them. -- Zechariah 12:8, American Standard Version.

But [Jehovah] will protect the people in Jerusalem. Even the man who trips and falls will become a great soldier like David. And the men from David’s family will be like gods—like [Jehovah]’s own angel leading the people. -- Easy-to-Read Version; We have placed "[Jehovah]" where God's Holy Name appears in the Hebrew.

On that day Yahweh will defend those who live in Jerusalem so that even those who stumble will be like David, and David’s family will be like Elohim, like the Messenger of Yahweh ahead of them. -- Names of God Bible.

In that day, Jehovah will defend the inhabitants of Jerusalem. He who is feeble among them at that day will be like David, and the house of David will be like the mighty ones, like an angel of Jehovah before them. -- Restoration Light Improved Version.

In the Hebrew, there is no definite article attached to "angel". Translators add the definite article "the" before angel, thus making it appear to refer to one specific angel, which many, based on the false teaching that there is only one "angel of Jehovah". Many would demand that this one angel is the prehuman Jesus. Many also mistakenly link "before them" to the angel spoken of in Exodus 23:20, which refers to an angel going ahead of the Israelites. Then, based on the imagined assumption that this angel is Jesus, they claim that the angel of Zechariah 12:8 is the Lord Jesus, who they usually claim to be God. They would evidently desire HaElohim to be speaking of an angel of Jehovah, although the scripture does not actually state what is being imagined and assumed. Indeed, we haven't found anything in any version of Zechariah 12:8 that calls any "angel of Jehovah" "God" (HaElohim). That thought has to read into what is stated. 

More than likely, however, HaElohim in Zechariah 12:8 is not referring to the Supreme Mighty One. It could be referring to kings, princes, in general as a class of mighty ones, "gods", similar to the way the KJV applies it in Exodus 21:6; 22:8,9,28. It is our conclusion that HaElohim in Zechariah 12:8 refers to angels, as in Psalm 8:5 (Hebrews 2:7). 

Benson states that it refers to "angels, as the word אלהים, Elohim, is rendered, Psalm 8:3". [Evidently this was meant to be Psalm 8:5] -- Benson Commentary on the Old and New Testaments.

The Hebrew does not have the linking verb, which many translations supply as "shall be" or "will be", which matches the context of "in that day", indicating the future.

With the above in mind, we believe the better rendering to the final part of the verse should be: "the house of David shall be as the mighty beings [ha elohim], as an angel of Jehovah before them." This could be seen as paralleling "an angel of Jehovah" as representative of the ELOHIM being referred to.

Many believe the house of David refers to those of old who had faith as spoken of in Hebrews 12. Antitypical, we believe it could be seen also as referring to the church, and David himself represents Jesus, as in Psalm 16:9-11 (Acts 2:25-36) and Ezekiel 34:23,24; 37:24 (John 10:11,14,16,29; Acts 3:15; 5:30), the head of the church. Every member of the church will indeed have to become like Jehovah, in God-like character. This includes all who belong to Jesus in this age (irrespective of what reward one receives), as well as the "other sheep" of the age to come. If the antitypical "house of David" is limited to Jesus and joint-heirs with him, every one of these will not only be like the mighty ones, like an angel of Jehovah who is before the house of David, but they will evidently be exalted with Jesus above these mighty angels of Jehovah, and be given all power with Jesus.

Regardless, there is no mention in this verse, or anywhere else in the Bible, of a triune God, or that the Son of God is his own God and Father. Jehovah is definitely not presented as being more than one person. 

Even if HaElohim is referring to Jehovah, it should not be understood as applying HaElohim with such a meaning to an angel of Jehovah. 

We certainly should not conclude that the house of David is actually an angel of Jehovah, but rather that the preposition, rendered as "as" or "like", designates that the house of David is to become like the ELOHIM (angels), that is, like an angel of Jehovah. The idea that the House of David is Jehovah, or a person of Jehovah, etc, certainly has to be imagined, assumed, added to, and read into what is stated. The same is true of the expression "angel of Jehovah".




Tuesday, November 4, 2025

John 8:58 - Before Abraham was God?

One, evidently a Unitarian who does not believe in the prehuman existence of Jesus, has presented the idea that the Greek phrase in John 8:58, often transliterated as “prin Abraam genesthai ego eimi”,  should be rendered as “before Abraham was God”. This is based on the assumption that “ego eimi” is being used in John 8:58 as the name often transliterated as EHJEH (from the Masoretic text) in Exodus 3:14. 

We have no scriptural reason to think that when Jesus spoke the words often transliterated as EGO EIMI in John 8:58, that he was using the Holy Name EHJEH of Exodus 3:14. Jesus was responding to the Jews' question regarding his age, stating that he, himself, had been in existence before Abraham. They did not ask if God existed before Abraham, for I am sure that they already knew that God existed before Abraham. 

It was claimed that John 8:58 should be rendered as “God (Ehyeh) was before Abraham”, because “Yeshua's life started when he was born on earth, as you can see in Luke 2:52”. Of course, there is nothing in Luke 2:52 that says that Jesus did not have a life in heaven with his God before he was made flesh, so the idea has to be assumed, added to, and read into what is stated in that verse.

The problem would be with the Greek application of the Greek verb often transliterated as “genesthai”, which is rendered as “was” in the rendering “Before Abraham was God”. This rendering would make the subject of genesthai to be “EGO EIMI”. Evidently, such an application of “EGO EIMI” is that with the thought that Ego Eimi is a name, and thus is used as a noun, and as the subject of genesthai. Evidently, this is thought to correspond with the way the third usage of EHJEH in Exodus 3:14 is used as a noun, designating the first-person verb form of God's Holy Name, which is presented in the third-person verb form, often rendered into English as “Jehovah” or “Yahweh”, in Exodus 3:15.

We do not know of any usage of Ego Eimi in the manner anywhere in the Greek NT, or even in the LXX of the Old Testament, that does such with the Greek phrase EGO EIMI. 

In the Bible, Hebrew names from the Old Testament are usually translated, but the sound of the Hebrew is adapted and given a Greek form. If Jesus had intended to use the Holy Name of Exodus 3:14, it would have been extraordinary for him to not bring that name into Greek, adapted from the Hebrew sounding of that name.

Another problem is with the word genesthai. Unlike EIMI, which pertains to being or existence, genesthai, carries with it a meaning of coming into existence.  To use EGO EIMI as the subject of genesthai would make Jesus' God appear to have come into existence before Abraham. 

I put the given rendering into Google's AI, and got the following results:

No, the Greek phrase "EGO EIMI" cannot be used as a noun and the subject of the Greek word "genesthai" in John 8:58.

Here is a grammatical breakdown of the relevant part of the Greek text (πρὶν Ἀβραὰμ γενέσθαι, ἐγὼ εἰμί - prin Abraam genesthai, ego eimi):

prin: This is an adverb/conjunction meaning "before".

Abraam: This is the noun "Abraham", in the accusative case, which functions as the subject of the following infinitive genesthai in this construction.

genesthai: This is an aorist infinitive verb, meaning "to become", "to come into being", "to be born", or "to arise". In this context, it refers to Abraham's birth or existence. The subject of an infinitive in Greek typically appears in the accusative case.

ego eimi: This is a complete clause on its own.

ego: This is the first-person singular personal pronoun, meaning "I". It is the subject of eimi.

eimi: This is the first-person singular present active indicative form of the verb "to be", meaning "I am", "I exist", or "I live". 

The phrase "EGO EIMI" functions as the main verb and its subject in the independent clause, while the entire phrase "prin Abraam genesthai" functions as an adverbial clause modifying the main clause, indicating the time of the action (before Abraham was born). "Abraam" is the subject of genesthai. 

Therefore, "EGO EIMI" is not a noun, nor is it the subject of genesthai. The structure of the sentence means: "Before Abraham came into being, I exist" (or "I have been in existence"). 

Nevertheless, Jesus' statement that his God and Father was in existence before Abraham does indeed not answer the question, “You are not yet fifty years old! Have you seen Abraham?” -- John 8:57.

Links to Related Studies

Monday, September 15, 2025

John 5:18; 10:33 - The Jews Sought the More to Kill Him

 John 5:18; 10:33 - The "Cause" to Kill Jesus

For this cause therefore the Jews sought the more to kill him, because he not only brake the sabbath, but also called God his own Father, making himself equal with God. -- John 5:18, American Standard Version.

The Jews answered him, For a good work we stone thee not, but for blasphemy; and because that thou, being a man, makest thyself God. -- John 10:33, American Standard Version.


Some time ago one claimed, in a post that no longer exists, that John did not say that it was the Jews who were claiming that Jesus was equal with God, but rather that they only took issue with Jesus calling God his father. This would seem to seek to separate "called God his Father" from "making himself equal to God." It appears to be saying that the Jews objected to Jesus' referring to God as his father, but did not equate this with being equal to God, but that rather it is John himself (not the Jews), who supplies the information that it is making himself equal with God, and that "the idea that it was just their [the Jews'] opinion is merely an assumption not found in the text."

Did John say that the reason that the Jews gave for killing Jesus is accurate? Would this not make make what Jesus said in John 10:32 incorrect? Actually, the ending phrase of John 10:32 gives the reason -- from the perspective of their argument -- as to why the Jews were objecting to Jesus' referring to his God as his Father. In view of the Jews' claim recorded in John 10:33, wherein they stated that Jesus was a man making himself out to be God (or a god), the default reasoning is that John was simply defining the Jewish "cause" to kill Jesus in John 5:18. Indeed, it really doesn't make sense to say that they were only objecting to Jesus referring to God as his Father, without there being some reason for such objection based on Jewish law, and such a reason would have to be such that it would offer a "cause" for killing Jesus.


Of course, the Jewish leaders could have been speaking of "god" in a more general way as the angels are referred to as "gods" (Psalm 8:5; Hebrews 2:7), or similar to the way the sons of the Most High are "gods". (Psalm 82:6) Jesus, by claiming to have come down from heaven from God, was indeed claiming to have been such a god -- a mighty spirit being -- before he became flesh with a glory a little lower than the angels. (John 1:14; Hebrews 2:9) John wrote of this in John 1:1, where John spoke Jesus as "the Word" before being made flesh. John used the Greek for "God/god" of Jesus, but obviously not with the meaning of being the "one God" from whom are all. (1 Corinthians 8:6) If this is what is meant in John 5:18, then the final statement is partly true, for Jesus was such a divine being before he became flesh, but it was not true at the time the Jews were making their accusation because Jesus did not have that divine glory while he was in the days of his flesh. -- John 17:5; Hebrews 5:7.
See also our study: 
Who Are the Gods?

Nevertheless, since Jesus is not Jehovah, the "one God" from whom are all (1 Corinthians 8:6), Jesus' calling his God his Father would not make him equal to the exclusive glory of the Most High, nor equal to the Supreme Being, as possessing the glory of being "one God" from whom are all. If this is what is meant, such an assumption would be that made by the Jewish leaders, for Jehovah is called "our Father" in 1 Chronicles 29:10; Isaiah 63:16; 64:8, without any thought that this makes the people of Israel equal to Jehovah.

Jehovah Himself confirms his being a Father to Israel as recorded in Jeremiah 3:19; 31:9.
Likewise, Jesus instructed his followers to refer to God as "our Father" (Matthew 6:9) and many times referred to his God as being the Father of his disciples (Matthew 5:16,45; 6:1,4,6,8,15,18; 7:11; 10:20,29; 18:4; John 20:17, etc). Paul spoke of God as "our Father" (Romans 1:7; 1 Corinthians 1:3; 2 Corinthians 1:2; Galatians 1:3; Ephesians 1:2; Philippians 1:2; Colossians 1:2; 1 Thessalonians 1:1; 2 Thessalonians 2:16; Philemon 1:3) without any thought that such makes one equal to God.

Jesus, however, was just not a son of God, he was "the" Son of God, the only one who was begotten directly from God, being the firstborn (first to be brought forth) of God. (Colossians 1:15) Whether the Jews understood this or not, the Bible does not say, but Jesus' parable indicates the Jews did know he was the heir sent from God but did not want to accept him as such. -- Matthew 21:38.

For more regarding Jesus as the firstborn creature, see:
Studies Related to Jesus as Firstborn

However, the one to whom we originally responded claims that John, by his statement recorded in John 5:18, was not just reporting any reason of the Jews for killing Jesus, but that John evidently meant that the Jews were simply "balking at what Jesus was saying". We have no reason to imagine and assume such. Indeed, we are not sure how one could read John 5:18 and come to such a conclusion, for it is plainly stated: "for this cause therefore the Jews sought the more to kill him, because ..., but also". John does indeed record two different legal causes that the Jews were claiming for killing Jesus. 

It was claimed that John calls Jesus "God" throughout his gospel, evidently by "God" meaning the Supreme Being, and a list of scriptures is given where, evidently, it is alleged that John calls Jesus "God", although when we look at those scriptures, we do not find what is being claimed: John 1:1; 1:18; 5:18; 5:23; 8:58; 9:38; 10:33, 36; 12:41 and 20:28. Other scriptures are given for comparison: Romans 9:5; Titus 2:13; 2 Peter 1:1; Hebrews 1:8; Philippians 2:6; Colossians 1:19; 2:9.

Most of the scriptures we have examined in studies online. One can go to our Scriptures Examined page, and follow the links to find studies related to these scriptures.

We do not believe that John ever intended anything he wrote to mean that he was saying that Jesus is the Supreme Being, the "one God" from whom are all. (1 Corinthians 8:6) In a very, very few instances, the Greek word for "God" is applied to Jesus, but obviously not with the meaning of Supreme  Being, but with a more general meaning of a mighty one. In Biblical Hebraic usage, the Hebrew/Greek words that are often translated as "God/god" can be used in other ways than simply designated the Supreme Mighty One or false gods. See our study on the Hebraic Usage of the Titles for "God".