Skip to main content

John 8:58 - Before Abraham was God?

One, evidently a Unitarian who does not believe in the prehuman existence of Jesus, has presented the idea that the Greek phrase in John 8:58, often transliterated as “prin Abraam genesthai ego eimi”,  should be rendered as “before Abraham was God”. This is based on the assumption that “ego eimi” is being used in John 8:58 as the name often transliterated as EHJEH (from the Masoretic text) in Exodus 3:14. 

We have no scriptural reason to think that when Jesus spoke the words often transliterated as EGO EIMI in John 8:58, that he was using the Holy Name EHJEH of Exodus 3:14. Jesus was responding to the Jews' question regarding his age, stating that he, himself, had been in existence before Abraham. They did not ask if God existed before Abraham, for I am sure that they already knew that God existed before Abraham. 

It was claimed that John 8:58 should be rendered as “God (Ehyeh) was before Abraham”, because “Yeshua's life started when he was born on earth, as you can see in Luke 2:52”. Of course, there is nothing in Luke 2:52 that says that Jesus did not have a life in heaven with his God before he was made flesh, so the idea has to be assumed, added to, and read into what is stated in that verse.

The problem would be with the Greek application of the Greek verb often transliterated as “genesthai”, which is rendered as “was” in the rendering “Before Abraham was God”. This rendering would make the subject of genesthai to be “EGO EIMI”. Evidently, such an application of “EGO EIMI” is that with the thought that Ego Eimi is a name, and thus is used as a noun, and as the subject of genesthai. Evidently, this is thought to correspond with the way the third usage of EHJEH in Exodus 3:14 is used as a noun, designating the first-person verb form of God's Holy Name, which is presented in the third-person verb form, often rendered into English as “Jehovah” or “Yahweh”, in Exodus 3:15.

We do not know of any usage of Ego Eimi in the manner anywhere in the Greek NT, or even in the LXX of the Old Testament, that does such with the Greek phrase EGO EIMI. 

In the Bible, Hebrew names from the Old Testament are usually translated, but the sound of the Hebrew is adapted and given a Greek form. If Jesus had intended to use the Holy Name of Exodus 3:14, it would have been extraordinary for him to not bring that name into Greek, adapted from the Hebrew sounding of that name.

Another problem is with the word genesthai. Unlike EIMI, which pertains to being or existence, genesthai, carries with it a meaning of coming into existence.  To use EGO EIMI as the subject of genesthai would make Jesus' God appear to have come into existence before Abraham. 

I put the given rendering into Google's AI, and got the following results:

No, the Greek phrase "EGO EIMI" cannot be used as a noun and the subject of the Greek word "genesthai" in John 8:58.

Here is a grammatical breakdown of the relevant part of the Greek text (πρὶν Ἀβραὰμ γενέσθαι, ἐγὼ εἰμί - prin Abraam genesthai, ego eimi):

prin: This is an adverb/conjunction meaning "before".

Abraam: This is the noun "Abraham", in the accusative case, which functions as the subject of the following infinitive genesthai in this construction.

genesthai: This is an aorist infinitive verb, meaning "to become", "to come into being", "to be born", or "to arise". In this context, it refers to Abraham's birth or existence. The subject of an infinitive in Greek typically appears in the accusative case.

ego eimi: This is a complete clause on its own.

ego: This is the first-person singular personal pronoun, meaning "I". It is the subject of eimi.

eimi: This is the first-person singular present active indicative form of the verb "to be", meaning "I am", "I exist", or "I live". 

The phrase "EGO EIMI" functions as the main verb and its subject in the independent clause, while the entire phrase "prin Abraam genesthai" functions as an adverbial clause modifying the main clause, indicating the time of the action (before Abraham was born). "Abraam" is the subject of genesthai. 

Therefore, "EGO EIMI" is not a noun, nor is it the subject of genesthai. The structure of the sentence means: "Before Abraham came into being, I exist" (or "I have been in existence"). 

Nevertheless, Jesus' statement that his God and Father was in existence before Abraham does indeed not answer the question, “You are not yet fifty years old! Have you seen Abraham?” -- John 8:57.

Links to Related Studies

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Zechariah 3:2 - Does Jehovah Ask Jehovah to Rebuke Satan?

Zechariah 3:1-2 - And he showed me Joshua the high priest standing before the angel of Jehovah, and Satan standing at his right hand to be his adversary.[2] And Jehovah said unto Satan, Jehovah rebuke thee, O Satan; yea, Jehovah that hath chosen Jerusalem rebuke thee: is not this a brand plucked out of the fire? -- American Standard Version .  Deuteronomy 6:4 - Hear, O Israel: Jehovah our God is one Jehovah. -- American Standard Version. Zechariah 3:2 is sometimes quoted as proof that Jesus is called "Jehovah" and therefore it is claimed that Jesus is a person of the trinitarian concept of three persons in God. Of course, there is nothing all here that presents any concept that the one Jehovah is more than one person, or that He is three persons, etc. Such concepts have to imagined, assumed, added to, and read into what is stated. As it reads in the translation above, it would appear that there are two different Jehovahs, one Jehovah who speaks of another Jehovah, ...

Psalm 110:5 - Did David Claim the Messiah is Jehovah?

The Lord is at your right hand. He will crush kings in the day of his wrath. -- Psalm 110:5, World English . Some refer to Psalm 110:5 as proof that Jesus is Jehovah, or a person of Jehovah. The claim appears to be that since David's Lord is spoke of as being at the right hand of Jehovah in Psalm 110:1, that Jehovah is depicted as being at the right hand of Jehovah in Psalm 110:5 must be referring to the Messiah as the second person Jehovah, sitting at the right hand of the first person of Jehovah. Of course, one has to add a lot of assumptions to the what is said in Psalm 110:1,5 in order to "see" any idea of the alleged trinity at all. The Masoretic text does not have the Holy Name in this verse; it has what is often transliterated as "adonay/adonai." http://qbible.com/hebrew-old-testament/psalms/110.html#5 The original Hebrew, however, does not actually have ADONAY anywhere. In the ancient Hebrew, there is no distinction between adonay and adony. They a...

Hebrews 1:10-12- Does Jehovah Speak to Jehovah?