Skip to main content

John 14:7-10 - Seeing the Father in Jesus

John 14:7 - If you had known me, you would have known my Father also. From now on, you know him, and have seen him."

John 14:8 - Philip said to him, "Lord, show us the Father, and that will be enough for us."
 
John 14:9 - Jesus said to him, "Have I been with you such a long time, and do you not know me, Philip? He who has seen me has seen the Father. How do you say, 'Show us the Father?' 

John 14:10 Don't you believe that I am in the Father, and the Father in me? The words that I tell you, I speak not from myself; but the Father living in me does his works.

World English Bible translation

John 14:9, especially, is often referred to as proof that Jesus is God Almighty. However, very few seem to present any information as to how this is supposed to mean that Jesus is God Almighty. If one reads many trinitarian writings, you will often see this scripture listed or quoted as proof of the doctrine, but with no serious explanation given as to how this is supposed to show that Jesus is a person of God Almighty. On the other hand, we can see that one could read into this that Jesus was saying that he was the Father, as do our "oneness" neighbors.

While some "oneness" believers point to this scripture as proof that Jesus is the Father, not all do so.

 However, Jesus is certainly not saying here that he is his Father, which would be the logical conclusion one would reach if one were to read into this that Jesus is saying that he is God Almighty. He said: "He who has seen me has seen the Father." Did he mean that everyone who physically saw him walking around on earth had seen his God and Father walking around on earth? No, because he also had earlier said to the unbelieving Jews: "The Father himself, who sent me, has testified about me. You have neither heard his voice at any time, nor seen his form." (John 5:37) And again in John 8:19: "You know neither me, nor my Father. If you knew me, you would know my Father also."

This indicates that Jesus meant that if his disciples had seen him, that they also had seen his Father, for he did the works of his Father. (John 8:38) As John said: "No one has seen God at any time. The one and only Son, who is in the bosom of the Father, he has declared him." (John 1:18) And Jesus also had said: "Therefore everyone who hears from the Father, and has learned, comes to me. Not that any man has seen the Father, except he who is from God. He has seen the Father." -- John 6:45,46.

However, Jesus in the context does tell us what he meant when he said that he who had seen him had seen the Father also: "Don't you believe that I am in the Father, and the Father in me? The words that I tell you, I speak not from myself; but the Father living in me does his works." (John 14:10) Rather than claiming to be God Almighty, he is saying that he spoke the words of God Almighty his Father, and thus in this manner the Father could be seen in him. This is in harmony with the prophecy that Yahweh would put his words into his mouth, and that he would speak in Yahweh's name. -- Deuteronomy 18:15-19.

Jesus was stating in John 14:9 that he so reflected the Father's character, that to observe and learn of him was tantamount to observing and learning of the Father. Literally, of course, "no man has seen God at any time". -- John 1:18; 1 John 4: 12; 2 Corinthians 4:4; Colossians 1:15.

One claims that we go beyond the statements Jesus made,  claiming: that it is clear no one sees him as the Father, since the Father did not have a physical body but was Spirit; that the Spirit was in Christ, and so the Father was in Christ, making Jesus the Father, and one that has seen Jesus would have seen the Father, only didn't understand that;  and that Philip asked to SEE the Father, in verse 9, evidently with the thought that since Philip asked to see the Father, then Jesus was saying that he was the Father.

Actually, the above reasoning goes beyond the statements Jesus actually made. If one is consistent in applying such reasoning, every believer would be the Father or God, since the spirit of God is in him. When Jesus sent out his twelve apostles, he told them: "For it is not you who speak, but the Spirit of your Father who speaks in you." (Matthew 10:20) Should we imagine and assume from this that all of the apostles are the Father, since the spirit of the Father spoke in them?

And Jesus said: "Though you don't believe me, believe the works; that you may know and believe that the Father is in me, and I in the Father." (John 10:38)

And he further said: "Don't you believe that I am in the Father, and the Father in me? The words that I tell you, I speak not from myself; but the Father living in me does his works." (John 14:10)

Nevertheless, he also said: "In that day you will know that I am in my Father, and you in me, and I in you." (John 14:20)

Are we to think that all of Jesus' disciples are Jesus since he said that he is in them, and that they are in him?

Yet he also prayed: "that they may all be one; even as you, Father, are in me, and I in you, that they also may be one in us." (John 17:21) Jesus also says concerning the Comforter: "You know him, for he lives with you, and will be in you." (John 14:7) John later says: "By this we know that we remain in him and he in us, because he has given us of his Spirit." (1 John 4:13) "he who remains in love remains in God, and God remains in him. " (1 John 4:16) "If that which you heard from the beginning remains in you, you also will remain in the Son, and in the Father." (1 John 2:24)

If the fact that Jesus uses the expression that he is in the Father and the Father is in him means that Jesus is God Almighty, or that he is the Father, then logically one should follow through and say that his disciples *are* also God Almighty, or the the Father, for they are in the Father and Jesus, even as the Father is in Jesus and Jesus in the Father, etc. Of course, this it is nonsense to think that the believer is God or the Father because the scripture says that the Father is in him.

Someone else objects that the word "seen" means to actually see with the eyes, and thus when they actually saw Jesus, they were actually seeing the Father with their eyes. The word translated "seen" is Strong's #3708, which is defined as: "1. to see with the eyes; 2. to see with the mind, to perceive, know; 3. to see, i.e. become acquainted with by experience, to experience; 4. to see, to look to, a. to take heed, beware, b. to care for, pay heed to; 5. I was seen, showed myself, appeared."* Thus we see that the word, like our English word "see", can be used in both a literal and figurative sense.
==========
*Thayer
https://www.studylight.org/lexicons/eng/greek/3708.html

No mortal being could literally see the God and Father of our Lord Jesus and live. (Exodus 33:20) Furthermore, if seeing the flesh of Jesus physically meant seeing the God and Father of Jesus, then this would also mean that Jewish leaders also saw the God and Father of Jesus when they saw his flesh. This cannot be true, however, since Jesus stated to them: "The Father himself, who sent me, has testified about me. You have neither heard his voice at any time, nor seen his form." -- John 5:37.

Jesus' statement in John 14:9 is to be understood in harmony with other scriptures. As it was impossible for the Lord's followers to actually see God, the Heavenly Father, the only way then in which they could see God was in the representative sense. Our Lord Jesus, fully and perfectly represented the Father. According to many translations, Jesus was God manifested in the flesh. (1 Timothy 3:16, KJV) Indeed, the Father's love, and mercy, justice, and wisdom, were all manifest in the Life and teachings of the Lord Jesus. Those then, who became closely associated with the Lord Jesus, were seeing the Father in him, while those who did not become closely associated with him, or who opposed him, did not see the Father in him.

The Lord Jesus never claimed to be the Heavenly Father personally; but always taught that He was the Son of his God and Father. Nor did Jesus ever claim to be the "one God" of whom are all, the Supreme Being. (1 Corinthians 8:6) The Scriptures declare that God sent His only begotten Son into the world. God was in Christ reconciling the world to Himself in the same sense in which He will be "all in all" when the Son shall have delivered up the Kingdom to the Father at the close of Christ's millennial reign. -- 1 Corinthians 15:17,28.


**************

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Zechariah 3:2 - Does Jehovah Ask Jehovah to Rebuke Satan?

Zechariah 3:1-2 - And he showed me Joshua the high priest standing before the angel of Jehovah, and Satan standing at his right hand to be his adversary.[2] And Jehovah said unto Satan, Jehovah rebuke thee, O Satan; yea, Jehovah that hath chosen Jerusalem rebuke thee: is not this a brand plucked out of the fire? -- American Standard Version .  Deuteronomy 6:4 - Hear, O Israel: Jehovah our God is one Jehovah. -- American Standard Version. Zechariah 3:2 is sometimes quoted as proof that Jesus is called "Jehovah" and therefore it is claimed that Jesus is a person of the trinitarian concept of three persons in God. Of course, there is nothing all here that presents any concept that the one Jehovah is more than one person, or that He is three persons, etc. Such concepts have to imagined, assumed, added to, and read into what is stated. As it reads in the translation above, it would appear that there are two different Jehovahs, one Jehovah who speaks of another Jehovah, ...

Psalm 110:5 - Did David Claim the Messiah is Jehovah?

The Lord is at your right hand. He will crush kings in the day of his wrath. -- Psalm 110:5, World English . Some refer to Psalm 110:5 as proof that Jesus is Jehovah, or a person of Jehovah. The claim appears to be that since David's Lord is spoke of as being at the right hand of Jehovah in Psalm 110:1, that Jehovah is depicted as being at the right hand of Jehovah in Psalm 110:5 must be referring to the Messiah as the second person Jehovah, sitting at the right hand of the first person of Jehovah. Of course, one has to add a lot of assumptions to the what is said in Psalm 110:1,5 in order to "see" any idea of the alleged trinity at all. The Masoretic text does not have the Holy Name in this verse; it has what is often transliterated as "adonay/adonai." http://qbible.com/hebrew-old-testament/psalms/110.html#5 The original Hebrew, however, does not actually have ADONAY anywhere. In the ancient Hebrew, there is no distinction between adonay and adony. They a...

Hebrews 1:10-12- Does Jehovah Speak to Jehovah?