Skip to main content

Acts 7:59 - Did Stephen Call Upon God?

(We are in the process of updating this study -- Ronald R. Day, Sr.)

From time to time, Acts 7:59 is cited from the King James Version as proof of the trinity doctrine. Oneness believers may also cite this verse from the KJV as proof that Jesus is God. The KJV reads:

And they stoned Stephen, calling upon God, and saying, Lord Jesus, receive my spirit.

The claim is made that Stephen called upon God, who is "Lord Jesus". The trinitarian may claim that this proves the trinity doctrine, although in reality there is nothing in the verse as it appears in the King James Version that speaks of Jehovah, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob as being more than one person, or that Jesus is a person of Jehovah. As throughout the Bible, the trinitarian dogma has forced into what Phillip stated.

We should certainly note that in the King James Version, the word "God" is in italics in Acts 7:59, which means that even in the Textus Receptus, there is no word in the Greek text to correspond with God. The word that denotes God in the Greek New Testament is often transliterated as THEOS. We do not find any form of this word in Acts 7:59.

Let us note what Ellicott states concerning this:
The word “God,” in the sentence “calling upon God,” it should be noted, is, as the italics show, an insertion to complete the sense.
Ellicot states the King James translators added "God" to complete the thought. Nevertheless, is this the thought Stephen had? Was he thinking that he was calling out to God Almighty? This wouldn't actually make sense, since in Acts 7:56 he had just referred to God as only one person (Jesus' Father) and distinguished Jesus from being God. Thus, the insertion of "God" into verse 59 makes it appear that Stephen was calling out to the Father of Jesus, thus making Jesus his own Father.  Oneness believers may support the KJV on this because of this point, but trinitarians do not usually present Jesus as being his Father. The fact is, however, that Stephen was addressing Jesus, the Son of God, not God at all, and thus the King James translators should not have inserted "God" into what Stephen said.

The reality is that THEOS is not found in any of the Greek manuscripts of Acts 7:59, nor any word for GOD found in ancient manuscripts translated into other languages. While one can find the word "God" left in some revisions made to the King James Version, no other translations we know of inserts "God" into Acts 7:59.

Concerning Acts 7:59, Adam Clarke tells us:
The word God is not found in any MS. or version, nor in any of the primitive fathers except Chrysostom. It is not genuine, and should not be inserted here: the whole sentence literally reads thus: And they stoned Stephen, invoking and saying, Lord Jesus, receive my spirit! 
One should note that we do not have Chrysostom's original manuscripts. Evidently what is being referred to is from later copies of translations of his writings into other languages. We have no way of knowing if Chrysostom actually wrote that Stephen called upon God, or whether such was added in translation or in copying. **** below needs to be edited.

The word God is not in the original, and should not have been in the translation. It is in none of the ancient mss. or versions. It should have been rendered, “They stoned Stephen, invoking, or calling upon, and saying, Lord Jesus,” etc. -- Albert Barnes.

There is no Ellipsis of the word God. See Revised Version. Stephen called upon and invoked the Lord. -- E. W. Bullinger.

The word God is not in the original, as its being printed in italics shows. -- Justin Edwards.

An unhappy supplement of our translators is the word “God” here; as if, while addressing the Son, he was really calling upon the Father. -- Jameison-Faussett-Brown.

The word God is not in the original. -- Joseph Benson.

In the original we have simply e? p??a???´ µe???, invoking or calling upon. The word to be supplied is evidently ‘the Lord,’ from the next clause, ‘Lord Jesus, receive my spirit.’ This is better than supplying ‘God,’ as in the English Version, which slightly confuses the reader. -- Philip Schaff.

Omit God. Lit. And were stoning Stephen as he was invoking and saying, Lord Jesus, give welcome unto my spirit. -- C. I. Scofield.

There is nothing for the word God in the original. -- Thomas Coke.

The Lord (in italics) for God (in italics), A.V. The A.V. is certainly not justified by the context, because the words which follow, "Lord Jesus," show to whom the invocation was made, even to him whom he saw standing at the right hand of God. -- Excell, Spence Jones and Maurice, The Pulpit Commentary.

God is not in the Greek. From the vision just described, and from the prayer which follows, it is evident that Jesus is meant. -- Marvin R. Vincent.

And they stoned Stephen, invoking and saying, Lord Jesus, receive my spirit - This is the literal translation of the words, the name of God not being in the original. -- John Wesley.

God—A word strangely inserted by the translators, and obscuring the fact that Stephen called upon Jesus. -- Daniel Whedon.

See these and many other commentators at:
https://www.studylight.org/commentary/acts/7-59.html
https://biblehub.com/commentaries/acts/7-59.htm
https://www.biblecomments.org/b/acts/7/59

Greek analysis of Acts 7:59














Comments

  1. Eccl. 12:7 "Then shall the dust return to the earth as it was: and the spirit shall return unto God"
    To whom shall spirit return? To Lord Jesus or to God?
    What "doctrine" Stephen believed as someone who must be familiar with words of Ecclesiastes 12:7? To whom/which "LORD" he want that his spirit go? Lord God or Lord Jesus? :))

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The spirit, the force of life that is from that keeps us alive, now returns to God through Jesus. God has given to his Son all authority, including the authority and power to give that spirit back in the resurrection day. I have a studies related to this at:
      https://bible-hope.blogspot.com/2017/10/eccl12-7.html
      https://jesusnotyhwh.blogspot.com/2019/09/mat28-18.html

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Zechariah 3:2 - Does Jehovah Ask Jehovah to Rebuke Satan?

Zechariah 3:1-2 - And he showed me Joshua the high priest standing before the angel of Jehovah, and Satan standing at his right hand to be his adversary.[2] And Jehovah said unto Satan, Jehovah rebuke thee, O Satan; yea, Jehovah that hath chosen Jerusalem rebuke thee: is not this a brand plucked out of the fire? -- American Standard Version .  Deuteronomy 6:4 - Hear, O Israel: Jehovah our God is one Jehovah. -- American Standard Version. Zechariah 3:2 is sometimes quoted as proof that Jesus is called "Jehovah" and therefore it is claimed that Jesus is a person of the trinitarian concept of three persons in God. Of course, there is nothing all here that presents any concept that the one Jehovah is more than one person, or that He is three persons, etc. Such concepts have to imagined, assumed, added to, and read into what is stated. As it reads in the translation above, it would appear that there are two different Jehovahs, one Jehovah who speaks of another Jehovah, ...

Psalm 110:5 - Did David Claim the Messiah is Jehovah?

The Lord is at your right hand. He will crush kings in the day of his wrath. -- Psalm 110:5, World English . Some refer to Psalm 110:5 as proof that Jesus is Jehovah, or a person of Jehovah. The claim appears to be that since David's Lord is spoke of as being at the right hand of Jehovah in Psalm 110:1, that Jehovah is depicted as being at the right hand of Jehovah in Psalm 110:5 must be referring to the Messiah as the second person Jehovah, sitting at the right hand of the first person of Jehovah. Of course, one has to add a lot of assumptions to the what is said in Psalm 110:1,5 in order to "see" any idea of the alleged trinity at all. The Masoretic text does not have the Holy Name in this verse; it has what is often transliterated as "adonay/adonai." http://qbible.com/hebrew-old-testament/psalms/110.html#5 The original Hebrew, however, does not actually have ADONAY anywhere. In the ancient Hebrew, there is no distinction between adonay and adony. They a...

Hebrews 1:10-12- Does Jehovah Speak to Jehovah?