Sunday, February 8, 2026

Acts 3:15 and the “Prince of Life”: What the Passage Really Says About Jesus and God

 

“And the Prince of the life ye did kill, whom God did raise out of the dead, of which we are witnesses.” — Acts 3:15, Young’s Literal Translation

Acts 3:15 is often quoted to support the idea that Jesus is God—either within a Trinitarian framework (three persons in one God) or within Oneness theology (one person manifesting as Father, Son, and Holy Spirit). However, a close reading of the passage and its context shows that only one person is identified as God, and that person is not Jesus.

God in Acts 3:15: One Person, the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob

In Acts 3:13–15, Peter consistently identifies “the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob” as the one who raised Jesus from the dead. Jesus is not presented as that God, but as the one whom God raised up and appointed as the promised prophet like Moses (Deuteronomy 18:15–19).

To claim that Peter was teaching that Jesus is God requires reading assumptions into the text. Nothing in the passage suggests a multi‑person Godhead or a single divine person manifesting in different modes. Instead, the narrative distinguishes clearly between God and the one whom God raised.

Does “Prince of Life” Mean Jesus Is God?

Much of the argument for Jesus being God in this verse centers on the Greek word archēgós (Strong’s #747), translated “Prince” in Young’s Literal Translation and many others.

According to HELPS Word Studies, archēgós is a compound of:

  • archē — “first”

  • agō — “to lead”

It describes:

“the first in a long procession; a pioneer leader or founding leader.”

Strong’s Concordance gives the sense of “chief leader, author, captain, prince.”
However, none of these meanings imply that Jesus is God Himself. The same word appears in:

  • Acts 5:31 — Jesus became prince and savior

  • Hebrews 2:10 — Jesus as the chief leader of salvation

  • Hebrews 12:2 — Jesus as the pioneer and perfecter of faith

In none of these passages is archēgós used to identify Jesus as Jehovah or as a person within God.”

Peter’s Message: Jesus Is God’s Appointed Leader, Not God Himself

If Peter intended to teach that Jesus is God Almighty—the ultimate source of all created life—his discourse in Acts 3:13–26 would reflect that. Instead, Peter repeatedly emphasizes:

  • God is one person: the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob

  • Jesus is God’s servant, prophet, and appointed leader

  • God raised Jesus from the dead

The distinction is consistent and unmistakable.

Why Jesus Is Called the “Prince of Life”

One reason Jesus is the “Prince of Life” because God gave Him authority to grant life (Matthew 28:18; John 5:21,25–29; 17:2). Jesus is God’s chosen instrument for salvation, not the ultimate source of life Himself. Scripture repeatedly affirms that:

  • God is the one who gives life (1 Timothy 6:13; 1 John 5:11)

  • God raised Jesus from the dead (Acts 2:24,32; 4:10; 10:40; Romans 8:11; 1 Peter 1:21)

  • Jesus’ authority is given to Him by God (John 3:35; 13:3; Ephesians 1:17–23)

Jesus’ role as life‑giver is therefore delegated, not inherent.

Jesus’ Role in Redemption

Because Adam’s disobedience brought sin and death upon all humanity, a perfect human life was needed to satisfy divine justice. God prepared a body for Jesus so that, through His obedience and sacrificial death, He could become the ransom for all (Romans 5:12–19; 1 Timothy 2:5–6; Hebrews 10:5–10; 1 Peter 3:18).

Jesus is the means by which God justifies sinners while remaining just. Yet even in this central role, Jesus is consistently portrayed as God’s servant, not as God Himself.

The Consistent Biblical Pattern

Across Acts 3 and the rest of Scripture, we find:

  • The God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob is always one person

  • Jesus is the one whom God anointed, sent, empowered, and raised

  • No passage teaches that Jesus is Jehovah

  • No passage presents God as more than one person

  • No passage supports the idea that Jesus is the same person as the God who anointed Him

Any Trinitarian or Oneness interpretation must be added to and read into the text, not drawn from it.

No comments:

Post a Comment