2 Corinthians 1:21 Now he who establishes us with you in Christ, and anointed us, is God;
2 Corinthians 1:22 who also sealed us, and gave us the down payment of the Spirit in our hearts.
.
The above is cited by John Ankerberg and John Weldon (The Facts on Jehovah’s Witnesses*, 1988 edition, page 14) as being one of the scriptures that would be impossible to understand if one rejects the trinity. Actually, we find nothing at all in the verse that is made impossible to understand by rejecting the trinity. The reality is that the verse is totally self-explanatory, simple to understand and it only becomes difficult to undertand if one imagines and assumes the trinity doctrine, and endeavors to insert that concept into the verses. Indeed, inserting and adding “triune God” dogma into the verses makes them appear to be self-contradictory.
It is evident that the word “God” in 2 Corinthians 1:21 does not refer to three persons; it refers to one person, the God and Father of Jesus. This is simple to understand and should be the end of the matter, as far who is "God" in 1 Corinthians 1. It is in harmony with 2 Corinthians 1:3, which reads in the World English: “Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Father of mercies and God of all comfort.” (See also Ephesians 1:3; 1 Peter 1:3) It is in harmony with 1 Corinthians 8:6, where only the Father is identified as being the "one God" of whom are all. Furthermore, in 1 Corinthians 1:9, we find the expression “Son of God”. Does the word “God” there mean three persons, or one person? It should be evident that “God” is being presented, not as three persons, but rather as one person.
Even the trinitarian has to admit that the word “God” is being used of one person in 2 Corinthians 1:3,9,21. The trinitarian, however, calls upon the spirit of human imagination so to assume and add to the scripture that “God” in these verses is referring to only one of the alleged three persons of their alleged triune God, that God the Father. They then further have to call upon the spirit of human imagination so as to assume, add to, and read into the verses that “Christ” also means the only true God, and then further call upon the spirit of human imagination so as to further assume that “Christ” means a person of the alleged “triune God”.
We also find the word “Christ”. Do we find any reason to imagine and assume that Christ is a person of God? None whatsoever. Nor do we find that not accepting Christ as being a person of an alleged “triune God” make the verse not understandable.
“Christ” means anointed one; who anointed Jesus as Christ? The scriptures reveal to us that it was Yahweh. Prophetically, the anointed one is quoted as saying: “Yahweh has anointed me.” (Isaiah 61:1, World English) In Isaiah 61:1, it is evident that Yahweh is one person, and that one anointed by Yahweh is not Yahweh who anointed him. We further read that Peter told the Jews: “God has made him both Lord and Christ, this Jesus whom you crucified.” (Acts 2:36, World English) Again, “God” in Acts 2:36, is speaking not of three persons, but one person, and it is the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob who anointed Jesus, and made him both Lord and Christ (anointed one).
We find in 1 Corinthians 1:22, that the word “spirit” is used. Is “spirit” identified as a person of “God”? Absolutely not! The scripture is completely understandable without calling upon human imagination so as to assume that “spirit” is here referring to a person of God. Nothing in either verse makes the verses impossible to understand without adding the triune dogma to the verses.
Likewise, with the word “spirit” in 2 Corinthians 1:22: the trinitarian has to call upon his human imagination so as assume that “spirit” refers to a person of the only true God. Actually, we can understand the verse completely without having to use our human imagination to read such trinitatrian assumptions into the scripture. Paul shows that the receiving of God’s holy spirit in this age is, in effect, only a down payment. In 2 Corinthians 5:5, he states: “Now he who made us for this very thing is God, who also gave to us the down payment of the Spirit.” And in Ephesians 1:13,14, he wrote: “You were sealed with the Holy Spirit of promise, which is a down payment of our inheritance.” One can understand all of this without calling upon human imagination so as to add to the scripture that “the Holy Spirit of God” (Ephesians 4:30) is a person of “God” to whom the Holy Spirit belongs.
Ronald R. Day, Sr., Restoration Light Bible Study Services (RLBible; ResLight).
Ronald R. Day, Sr., Restoration Light Bible Study Services (RLBible; ResLight).
============
*See our examination of Ankerberg and Weldon's book:
Please note that we are not associated with the Jehovah’s Witnesses, nor is it our purpose to defend that organization.
Search words:
Search words:
If you could understand the application of the English word 'lord' in our translations as inherited from the Septuagint, you would ask yourself why Angel of the Lord announced to the shepherds that the Lord was born (not Jesus) in Luke 2:11. Since Judaism has only one Lord, Jesus must be that only Lord of Judaism, and Lord is the English reference word for all 3 occurrences of YHWH, ADON, ADONAI. That is SIMPLY why Jesus is YHWH.
ReplyDeleteAbner Cesaire stated:
DeleteIf you could understand the application of the English word 'lord' in our translations as inherited from the Septuagint,
I am aware of how the so called Christianized Septuagint changed the Holy Name to forms of the word often transliterated as Kurios (and THEOS, and possibly some other words). We do not find any authorization in the Bible that authorizes anyone to change the Holy Name to other words. I am also aware that many trinitarians try to use the fact that the Holy Name has been changed to other words in the New Testament as alleged "proof" that Jesus is Jehovah. Such tactics are actually a misuse of scripture.
For links to some of my studies related to the Holy Name:
The Holy Name of God
Abner Cesaire stated:
Deleteyou would ask yourself why Angel of the Lord announced to the shepherds that the Lord was born (not Jesus) in Luke 2:11.
Luke 2:11- For there is born to you, this day, in the city of David, a Savior, who is Christ the Lord.
Acts 2:36 - "Let all the house of Israel therefore know assuredly that God has made him both Lord and Christ, this Jesus whom you crucified."
The word "Christ" means "anointed", and it refers, not to Jehovah, but to the Anointed of Jehovah (Psalm 2:2), as in Luke 2:26; yes, Luke 2:11 identifies the savior anointed and sent by Jehovah (Isaiah 61:1). "Christ the Lord" does not identify Jesus as being Jehovah, but as the one whom Jehovah anointed, making Jesus Christ. -- Acts 2:36.
If the Holy Name has been changed to "Lord" in Luke 2:11, then it should be viewed as saying that Jesus is the Anointed of Jehovah, as in Luke 2:26, in harmony with Psalm 2:2; 45:7; Isaiah 61:1; Acts 2:36, etc.
The one person who is "God" in Hebrews 1:2 sent His son as the savior of the world; Jehovah saves and reconciles the world to Himself through, by means of, the one whom He sent. -- Deuteronomy 18:15-19; Isaiah 61:1; Acts 3:13-26; John 3:17; 17:3; Romans 5:10; 1 Corinthians 8:6; 2 Corinthians 5:18,19; 1 John 4:9.10.
I have a study related to this:
Christ the Lord
Abner Cesaire stated:
DeleteSince Judaism has only one Lord, Jesus must be that only Lord of Judaism, and Lord is the English reference word for all 3 occurrences of YHWH, ADON, ADONAI. That is SIMPLY why Jesus is YHWH.
Judaism still has not been enlightened respecting Jesus and his God, Jehovah. The Hebrews in Biblcal times believed in "one Jehovah", not more than one Jehovah, or that Jehovah was more than one person. There is nothing in the scriptures that give reason to imagine and assume that Jesus is the one Jehovah, or that Jesus is a person of the one Jehovah.
Jesus is definitely not Jehovah who spoke to and through Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Moses, David, Elijah, Isaiah, Jeremiah, etc, not unless you believe Jesus now speaks through the Son of Jesus. -- Hebrews 1:1,2.
The Bible, however, uses forms of the Hebrew word often transliterated ADON (meaning "lord") of many different persons; it is not just used of Jehovah. ADONI (meaning, 'my lord') is not used exclusively of Jehovah in the Old Testament. The plural form often transliterated (from the Masoretic Hebrew text) as ADONAI or ADONAY adds a vowel point to the form often transliterated as ADONI or ADONY so as to make it plural. The Masoretes did this whenever they believed that ADONI referred to Jehovah. (This does not mean that Masoretes were totally accurate in doing this.) Forms of the word often transliterated as KURIOS or KYRIOS, however, in the New Testament may or may not, harmonize with the usage of a form of ADON applied to Jehovah.
For Abner Cesaire, some of my related studies:
DeleteThe Meaning of Echad
One Lord
One God, One Lord
Jesus is Lord
Besides Jehovah There is No Savior
The Only Ruler Who Possesses Immortality
The Only Despotes
Lord in the New Testament
The Holy Name in the New Testament
One Holy Name
Adonay, The Tetragrammaton, and the Great Isaiah Scroll
Why do you have to approve a comment? That means you are not a 100% solid on your belief.
ReplyDeleteI did have the sites set up to accept any comment without approval. The problem is that with about 18 sites and hundreds of posts it makes it very time consuming to try to locate what comments I have responded to and which I have not. Thus, the only way I can keep comments I have not responded to separate is by using the approval method. This certainly has nothing at all to do with being solid about what I belief. On the other hand, I am not perfect, and I am not dogmatic about how many scriptures should be applied. I am certain, however, that no scripture presents the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob as being more than one person, or that presents Jesus as being the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.
Deletevisit www.wojc.org to learn why Jesus is YHWH
ReplyDeleteI have examined some of what is presented on the wojc site. Most of what is stated has already been addressed somewhere on this site or on some of my other sites. I may, God willing, take some time in the future to address some of the direct statements given.
ReplyDeleteI would suggest prayerful examination of the studies linked to at:
https://jesusnotyhwh.blogspot.com/p/posts.html
(Including the links in the topics listed at the top)
and
https://notrinity.blogspot.com/p/on-this-site.html
also
https://sonofyah.wordpress.com/