The claim is that the holy spirit is being called "God" in Acts 5. Actually, this scripture does not directly call the holy spirit "God." Nor is it saying that Ananias spoke directly to God or to the holy spirit. It was evidently Peter that Ananias directly lied to. At most, from this scripture, one could gather that the holy spirit is "God", but there is nothing in the scripture that gives reason to assume that God's Holy Spirit is a separate person of God. This thought would have to be added to what is said.
"Peter said, Ananias, why hath Satan filled thy heart, to lie to the holy Spirit, and to keep back part of the price of the land?" -- Acts 5:3
One should note that the scriptures show that God's Holy Spirit is likened to God's finger, at least in as God's Holy Spirit represents the power of God. (Matthew 12:28; Luke 11:20) One's finger is, of course, an extension of one's self, but one would not say that one's finger is another person of oneself. Regardless, what one's finger does is what is directed by the owner of that finger; what is done by one's finger is what is done by the person to whom the finger belongs. Likewise, with God and His Holy Spirit. The point is that as one's finger is an extension of the person to whom the finger belongs, so God's Holy Spirit is an extension of God to whom the Holy Spirit belongs. God's Holy Spirit could be used as an extension of God as more or less figuratively being God's mouth, His eyes, His ears, His heart, His disposition, His will, etc. Of course, God's holy spirit, being an extension of God Himself, could certainly be spoken of as being grieved. This does not mean that we need to imagine, assume, add to, and read into the scriptures that God is three persons, and that His Holy Spirit is one of the persons of Himself.
It may also be helpful to note other instances in the Bible where an action is attributed to Jehovah but which are also attributed to a human that represented Jehovah. One such instance is 1 Samuel 12:1,13. Verse one says: "Samuel said to all Israel, Behold, I have listened to your voice in all that you said to me, and have made a king over you." It was Samuel who directly appointed Saul as King of Israel. In verse 13 however, we read: "Now therefore see the king whom you have chosen, and whom you have asked for: and, behold, Jehovah has set a king over you." Here we see that it is Jehovah who set a king over Israel. If we applied the same logic that many apply to Acts 5:3, we would conclude that Samuel is Jehovah. However, using common sense we understand that Samuel represented Jehovah when he appointed Saul as king over Israel.
Another example is the anointing of David as King of Israel. 1 Samuel 10:1; 12:7 tells that Jehovah anointed David. Samuel 16:13 says Samuel anointed David. Again, Samuel is not Jehovah, but rather he represented Jehovah who anointed him.
We might also take the case of Saul of Tarsus, before he became the apostle Paul, and the statements made concerning his persecuting the church. In Philippians 3:6 Paul described himself as persecuting the church. However, in Acts 9:5, we read: "He [Saul] said, 'Who are you, Lord?' The Lord said, 'I am Jesus, whom you are persecuting.'" Should we conclude from this that the church is Jesus. No, but we remember the words of Jesus to his disciples: "He who receives you receives me, and he who receives me receives him who sent me." -- Matthew 10:40.
See our study on Similarities for more examples.
The trinitarian logic on this, however, is that Ananias lied to the Holy Spirit, but the next verse says he lied to God. Therefore they reason that the holy spirit is God, and then they further reason that God is one, and thus, they further imagine, assume, add to, and read into what is stated that the Holy Spirit of God is a person of God, etc. If we follow through with the trinitarian reasoning, however, the trinitarian logic would also require the holy spirit is Peter, since Ananias actually lied directly to Peter. Viewed from the way trinitarians often use scriptures to prove the trinity, this would produce a trinity: Holy Spirit, God, and Peter. The reality is that lying to Peter and the church was tantamount to lying to God whom Peter represented as an apostle, and lying against the influence of God's Spirit. Nevertheless, the holy spirit is essentially God, since it is God's personal "set apart" [holy] spirit, that he utilizes to do his will. This does not mean that God's Holy Spirit is a separate person of God.
John 4:24
However, the scriptures also say that "God is a devouring fire", (Deuteronomy 4:24; see also Hebrews 12:29) We would not turn this around and say that a devouring fire is God, or that a "devouring fire" is a person of God. We also read that "God is love". Again, we would not turn this around and say that "Love" itself is God, or that "Love" is person of God.
God's holy spirit is likened to God's finger, His hand or His arm (as the power of God). -- Ezekiel 3:14; 8:3; 37:1; Matthew 12:28; Luke 11:20.
What God does through His holy spirit is what God himself has done. What is spoken to God's holy spirit, however, is the same as being said to God Himself.
Some related Studies on the holy spirit may be found at:
https://www.biblestandard.com/uploads/2/1/4/9/21496142/christ-spirit-covenants_[web].pdf

Thank you for this Bible explanation Brother Day. The following written in the first paragraph may be a typo perhaps - just wanted to let you know in case you were unaware of the issue :((It was Peter that Ananias directly lied to. Since Ananias lied directly to Peter, how ...)). Hebrews 6:10.
ReplyDeleteThanks for your comments. I do many times make typos. I am not sure, however, what you are see as a typo.
DeleteI just reread the passage again and realized all sounds good so it was most definately a mistake on my end. Thank you for all your wonderful explanations on Biblical matters that you share. May God Bless you richly in His own best ways. Philippians 4:8
Delete