Skip to main content

John 1:1 Regarding "Was" and Eternity

The following is an excerpt from James White’s dissertation on “John 1:1 - Meaning and Translation”. While we are not associated with the JWs, we have had this quote from James Whtie presented to us:
Some refer the “beginning” here to that of Genesis 1.1, and this may be so, but the verb “was” (Gr: en, imperfect of eimi) takes us before whatever “beginning” we may wish to choose. The continuous action in the past of the imperfect tense of the verb indicates to us that whenever the “beginning” was, the Word was already in existence. In other words, the Word is eternal – timeless – without a “beginning.”
James White claims the Greek word transliterated as EN (Strong's #2258: Imperfect Indicative Active, a form of Strong's #1510), in effect, would mean eternity, at least in John 1:1. It is evidently being assumed that “beginning” refers to absolutely everything in the created universe, and thus, since the Word “was” before such, then the Word was never created, and thus, has always been.

White claims that John 1:3 means that "there is simply nothing that is existent anywhere that was not created by the Word. He created everything." He claims that the context supports this conclusion. Actually, the context indicates that the "all" that God made through Jesus is everything pertaining to the world (KOSMOS - Strong's Greek #2889) that God made through Jesus, and into which Jesus came. (John 1:9,10; 17:5) John 1:10 tells us that this world that was made through him did not recognize Jesus. If this world includes absolutely everything that is existent anywhere, that would include the angels who are always able to the face of God. Did the world (KOSMOS) that Jesus came into include the invisible realm of heavenly spirit beings (angels)? Did he the world he came into include those angels so that those angels did not recognize him? Obviously, it is referring to what God made pertaining to the earthly world of mankind. Thus, we believe that the “all” of John 1:3 refers to -- not the whole created universe -- but rather to the world of mankind that was created through the Word. Jesus “was” (Strong's #2258, Imperfect Indicative Active), indeed, in existence before the beginning of the world of mankind that was made through him. — John 1:10; 17:5.


See some of our related studies: Jesus and Creation

Nevertheless, White places a lot of emphasis on the word “was”, and labors to make it mean eternity. Trinitarians often use the word "eternity' to mean never having a beginning and never having an end. If the Greek word rendered as "was" itself designates such an eternity, then in John 1:10 where we find the same verb form  (Imperfect Indicative Active) used,  one should conclude that Jesus is eternally in the world of mankind which did not recognize him. Likewise, in John 1:28, we find EN again in the phrase "where John was [EN] baptizing." Was John baptizing from all eternity past to all eternity future "beyond Jordon"? We could cite many more scriptures throughout the New Testament where the same verb form is used, but it is obviously not being used to designate eternity. In actuality, there is no reason to add to the scriptures that only in John 1:1 should the word *en* be understood to denote eternity, except that one has a preconceived idea that the Logos has always existed. In other words, the argument becomes circular, in effect, saying: “Since we believe that Jesus is uncreated, then *en* in John 1:1,2 means that Jesus always existed in all eternity past, and thus this gives proof that Jesus has always existed.” The word EN can, of course, in all the realms of possibilities, be used of one who has had no beginning, even as our English word “was” can, in all the realms of possibilities, be also used in such a way. This is not, however, an inherent meaning of either word. Comparing spiritual revealing with spiritual revealing, the usage of *en* all throughout the NT provides an abundance of testimony that such an idea is not inherent in the word.

http://bible.crosswalk.com/Lexicons/Greek/grk.cgi?number=2258

Nevertheless, we believe that it would be a mistake to assume that Jesus was created exactly at the beginning of the world of mankind. We do believe that Jesus was already existing with his God and Father before the beginning of the world of mankind. (John 1:10, 17:1,3,5) The idea that Jesus was eternally existing before the world of mankind was made, however, has to be added to and read into the scriptures.

However, there is nothing at all in John 1:1 that states that Jesus had always existed from all eternity past; that idea has to read into what is actually stated.


See: Studies Related to John 1:1









Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Zechariah 3:2 - Does Jehovah Ask Jehovah to Rebuke Satan?

Zechariah 3:1-2 - And he showed me Joshua the high priest standing before the angel of Jehovah, and Satan standing at his right hand to be his adversary.[2] And Jehovah said unto Satan, Jehovah rebuke thee, O Satan; yea, Jehovah that hath chosen Jerusalem rebuke thee: is not this a brand plucked out of the fire? -- American Standard Version .  Deuteronomy 6:4 - Hear, O Israel: Jehovah our God is one Jehovah. -- American Standard Version. Zechariah 3:2 is sometimes quoted as proof that Jesus is called "Jehovah" and therefore it is claimed that Jesus is a person of the trinitarian concept of three persons in God. Of course, there is nothing all here that presents any concept that the one Jehovah is more than one person, or that He is three persons, etc. Such concepts have to imagined, assumed, added to, and read into what is stated. As it reads in the translation above, it would appear that there are two different Jehovahs, one Jehovah who speaks of another Jehovah, ...

Psalm 110:5 - Did David Claim the Messiah is Jehovah?

The Lord is at your right hand. He will crush kings in the day of his wrath. -- Psalm 110:5, World English . Some refer to Psalm 110:5 as proof that Jesus is Jehovah, or a person of Jehovah. The claim appears to be that since David's Lord is spoke of as being at the right hand of Jehovah in Psalm 110:1, that Jehovah is depicted as being at the right hand of Jehovah in Psalm 110:5 must be referring to the Messiah as the second person Jehovah, sitting at the right hand of the first person of Jehovah. Of course, one has to add a lot of assumptions to the what is said in Psalm 110:1,5 in order to "see" any idea of the alleged trinity at all. The Masoretic text does not have the Holy Name in this verse; it has what is often transliterated as "adonay/adonai." http://qbible.com/hebrew-old-testament/psalms/110.html#5 The original Hebrew, however, does not actually have ADONAY anywhere. In the ancient Hebrew, there is no distinction between adonay and adony. They a...

Hebrews 1:10-12- Does Jehovah Speak to Jehovah?